Masterson v. Killen et al
Filing
88
ORDER granting 87 Motion to extend time to file Dispositive Motions signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/29/2016. (Dispositive Motion Deadline: 6/10/2016).(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL MASTERSON,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:11-cv-01179-DAD-SAB-PC
S. KILLEN, et al.,
15
(ECF NO. 87)
Defendants.
Dispositive Motion Deadline:
June 10, 2016
16
17
On April 28, 2016, Defendants filed a request to extend the dispositive motion filing
18 deadline from April 29, 2016, to June 10, 2016. Defendants’ motion is supported by the
19 declaration of counsel.
20
Counsel declares that in preparing the motion for summary judgment, she received 1, 200
21 additional pages of discovery from Plaintiff. In reviewing the discovery responses, counsel
22 discovered approximately fifteen declarations from thirteen inmates that Plaintiff contends were
23 drafted on his behalf and under penalty of perjury.
Counsel has begun the process of
24 interviewing the inmates. Specifically, counsel declares that telephonic interviews must be
25 scheduled to coincide with staff availability, and the telephonic interview process requires that
26 correctional staff be made available to escort the inmate to an area for the interview, remain with
27 the inmate, and then escort the inmate back to his cell.
28 ///
1
Good cause having been presented to the Court, Defendants’ motion to extend the
1
2 dispositive motion filing deadline is GRANTED. The dispositive motion filing deadline is
3 extended to June 10, 2016.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated:
April 29, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?