Mitchell v. Pena, et al.

Filing 60

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Correct the Spelling of Defendant "Pena" to "Pina" 56 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/13/14. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF DEFENDANT "PENA" TO "PINA " (Doc. 56) PENA, et al 15 Case No. 1:11-cv-01205-LJO-JLT (PC) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, John Edward Mitchell, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis, in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 which he filed on July 21, 2011. 18 On January 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Request for Correction of Title/Name of 19 Defendant 'Pena.'" (Doc. 56.) In this request, Plaintiff seeks to correct the spelling of the name 20 of "Defendant S. Pena" to "Defendant S. Pina." It is noted that a responsive pleading was filed by 21 "Defendant S. Pina (erroneously sued as 'Pena')." (Doc. 39, 1:20.) It is appropriate to correct the 22 spelling of Defendant's name from "S. Pena" to "S. Pina" to reflect the accurate spelling of 23 Defendant's surname. Accordingly, Plaintiff's "Request for Correction of Title/Name of Defendant 'Pena,'" filed 24 25 January 30, 2014 (Doc. 56), is HEREBY GRANTED. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to correct the spelling of "Defendant S. Pena" to 2 "Defendant S. Pina" both on the docket and in the caption of this action. Likewise, the parties 3 shall hereafter solely utilize the correct spelling of Defendant Pina's surname in all filings in this 4 action. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 13, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?