Moriarity v. Henriques et al
Filing
29
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 28 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/29/2013. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LINDA MORIARITY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
JANALIE HENRIQUES, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11-cv-01208 - JLT
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 28)
Plaintiff Linda Moriarity (“Plaintiff”) filed a Third Amended Complaint on January 24, 2013.
18
(Doc. 28). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), a party may amend a pleading once as a matter of course
19
within 21 days of service, or if the pleading is one to which a response is required, twenty-one days
20
after service of a responsive pleading. “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with
21
the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2).
22
In this case, Defendants filed an answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint on January
23
30, 2012. (Doc. 16). Thus, Plaintiff must obtain Defendant’s consent to file a Third Amended
24
Complaint, or seek leave of the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Moreover, in the scheduling
25
order, the Court explained any requested pleading amendments must be made “either through a
26
stipulation or motion to amend.” (Doc. 27 at 2). Nevertheless, Plaintiff has not filed a stipulation
27
indicating Defendants consent to the pleading amendment, and has not filed a motion for the Court’s
28
consideration with her Third Amended Complaint.
1
1
Because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and did not seek
2
leave of the Court or obtain Defendants’ consent to file a Third Amended Complaint, the amended
3
pleading is STRICKEN.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2013
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9j7khijed
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?