San v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER Extending Plaintiff's Time to Reply to Defendant's Responsive Brief (stipulation 18 ): Plaintiff shall file her reply brief on or before June 26, 2012. Although the Court granted this request in this instance, the Court ADMONISHES the parties that future requests for time extensions that fail to articulate any basis that establishes good cause for the request will be denied. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/25/2012. (Herman, H)

1
2
3

Ann M. Cerney, SBN: 068748
Attorney at Law
45 Hunter Square Plaza
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OUK SAN,

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1211-BAM

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

ORDER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO REPLY TO
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,

14
15

Defendant.
__________________________________/

16

ORDER

17

Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file a reply

18

brief to Defendant’s responsive brief. (Doc. 18) This is Plaintiff’s first request for a time extension

19

and the parties complied with Local Rule 144(d) by making their request well before June 5, 2012,

20

the required filing date. Therefore, the Court GRANTS the stipulation. Plaintiff shall file her reply

21

brief on or before June 26, 2012. Although the Court granted this request in this instance, the Court

22

ADMONISHES the parties that future requests for time extensions that fail to articulate any basis

23

that establishes good cause for the request will be denied.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k

May 25, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
S TIPU LATIO N

AN D

1
O RD ER E XTEN D IN G P LAIN TIFF ’S T IM E TO R EPLY T O D EFENDAN T ’S R ESPO N SIV E B RIEF