Rosas v. Biter, et al.

Filing 28

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition OR Statement of Non-Opposition Within Twenty-One Days re 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/26/2015. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RICHARD ROSAS,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS

BITER, et al.,

14

Case No. 1:11-cv-01213-LJO-SKO (PC)

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

(Doc. 27)
15
16

Plaintiff Richard Rosas, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

17 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 22, 2011. This action is proceeding
18 against Defendant Dileo for denial of adequate medical care, in violation of the Eighth
19 Amendment of the United States Constitution. On December 15, 2014, Defendant Dileo filed a
20 motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response.
21

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a

22 statement of non-opposition to Defendant Dileo’s motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff
23 is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action,
24 with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28

Dated:

January 26, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE