Light v. Rios

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING 5 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to enter Judgment and Close Case; ORDER DECLINING ***ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY***, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 08/16/2011. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JAMES LAWRENCE LIGHT, JR., 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) H. A. RIOS, JR., ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) 1:11-CV-01232 AWI GSA (HC) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #5] ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE ORDER DECLINING ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 11 12 13 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 14 On July 26, 2011, Petitioner filed his habeas petition in this Court. Shortly thereafter, on 15 August 10, 2011, he filed a motion to strike and withdraw his petition. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of 16 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a petitioner may dismiss an action without an order from the 17 Court by filing a notice of dismissal before the respondent files an answer or motion for dismissal. 18 Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the "Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure, to the extent that they are not inconsistent with any statutory provisions or these rules, 20 may be applied to a proceeding under these rules." At this time, Respondent has not filed an answer 21 to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), this case has terminated. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Clerk shall CLOSE this case in light of 24 Petitioner’s motion to strike, which the Court construes as a Rule 41(a)(1) voluntary dismissal. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: ciem0h August 16, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?