United States v. Approximately $77,000.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 48

FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION to Continue FRCP Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order Discovery Dates and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/28/2013. Deadlines extended as follows: Non-Expert Discovery due by 3/22/2013; Expert Disclosure due by 4/5/2013; Supplemental Expert Disclosure due by 4/19/2013; Expert Discovery due by 5/13/2013; Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 5/20/2013.(Martinez, A)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEATHER MARDEL JONES Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 (559) 497-4000 Telephone (559) 497-4099 Facsimile 6 Attorneys for the United States 1 2 3 4 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. APPROXIMATELY $77,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11-CV-01251-GSA FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FRCP RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING ORDER DISCOVERY DATES AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the United States of America, claimant Felix Velasco, and his counsel of record, as follows: On April 25, 2012, the parties to this matter submitted their Joint Scheduling Report 20 setting forth the various discovery, disclosure, and dispositive motion dates, as required 21 pursuant to FRCP Rule 16(b); 22 The parties now jointly agree that to facilitate and complete full discovery and 23 disclosure of said discovery, the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the 24 Joint Scheduling Report and the Court’s Scheduling Order issued pursuant thereto should 25 be extended approximately thirty (30) days; 26 27 28 That extension of the discovery dates will not affect the trial or pre-trial motion dates set forth in the Scheduling Order; The parties hereby stipulate that the dates set forth in the parties’ Joint Scheduling 29 30 1 Stipulation to Continue FRCP Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order Discovery Dates and Order 1 Report and in the Court’s May 3, 2012 Scheduling Order (Doc. 42) should be changed to 2 the following dates: 3 Discovery Event 4 5 6 7 Current Date/Deadline Proposed New Date Non-Expert Discovery February 20, 2013 March 22, 2013 Expert Disclosure Supplemental Expert Disclosure Expert Discovery March 6, 2013 March 20, 2013 April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 April 19, 2013 May 13, 2013 8 In the alternative, if it is the Court’s preference that the parties stipulate to continue 9 all dates within the Scheduling Order an additional 30 days, a further amended stipulation 10 shall be filed. Respectfully submitted, 11 12 DATED: January 25, 2013 13 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 14 /s/ Heather Mardel Jones HEATHER MARDEL JONES Assistant United States Attorney 15 16 17 18 DATED: January 25, 2013 19 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /s/ Edward M. Burch EDWARD M. BURCH Attorney for Claimant Felix Velasco (Original signature retained by attorney) /// 29 30 2 Stipulation to Continue FRCP Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order Discovery Dates and Order ORDER 1 All discovery dates currently set forth in the Court’s May 3, 2012 Scheduling Order 2 3 (Doc. 42) shall be rescheduled to those dates stipulated to by the parties, as set forth above. 4 Additionally, the parties are advised that the deadline for filing of non-dispositive 5 motions is extended until May 20, 2013, to accommodate for the expert discovery 6 deadline. All other deadlines for filing dispositive motions, the pretrial conference and the 7 trial remain as set forth in the scheduling order issued on May 3, 2012. (Doc. 42). All other 8 orders in the scheduling order remain in full force and effect. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 12 January 28, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Sign ature-END: 13 14 6i0kij8d 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 Stipulation to Continue FRCP Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order Discovery Dates and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?