United States v. Approximately $77,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Filing
90
FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/25/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
HEATHER MARDEL JONES
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
(559) 497-4000 Telephone
(559) 497-4099 Facsimile
6
Attorneys for the United States
1
2
3
4
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
APPROXIMATELY $77,000.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11-CV-01251-GSA
FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE
17
Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds:
18
1.
19
This is a civil forfeiture action against the defendant approximately $77,000.00
in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”) seized on or about January 25, 2011.
2.
20
A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (“Complaint”) was filed on July 28,
21
2011, alleging that said defendant currency is subject to forfeiture to the United States of
22
America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
3.
23
24
On August 2, 2011, the Clerk issued a Warrant for Arrest for the defendant
currency. The warrant for the defendant currency was duly executed on August 9, 2011.
4.
25
Beginning on August 3, 2011, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United
26
States published notice of this action on the official government forfeiture site
27
www.forfeiture.gov.
28
///
29
30
1
Final Judgment of Forfeiture
1
5.
In addition to the public notice on the official internet government forfeiture
2
site www.forfeiture.gov, actual notice or attempted notice was given to the following
3
individuals:
4
a. Felix Velasco
5
b. Jorge Luis Tostado Delgado
6
c. Edward M. Burch, attorney
7
6.
On August 15, 2011, Felix Velasco filed a Verified Claim of Felix Velasco
8
Opposing Forfeiture and Answer of Felix Velasco to Government’s Complaint for Forfeiture
9
In Rem.
10
7.
No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time in
11
which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. As such, the Clerk of
12
the Court entered a Clerk’s Certificate of Entry of Default against Jorge Luis Tostado
13
Delgado on April 19, 2013.
14
8.
On January 18, 2013, Claimant filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
15
Jurisdiction. On January 25, 2013, the United States filed a Motion to Amend the
16
Complaint to add the Verification signature page. On February 1, 2013, the United States
17
filed its Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. On February 22, 2013, Claimant filed his
18
Opposition to the Motion to Amend. On February 28, 2013, the United States filed its Reply
19
to the Opposition to the Motion to Amend. On March 1, 2013, Claimant filed his Reply to
20
the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. On March 4, 2013, Claimant filed a Notice of
21
Newly Discovered Pertinent Authority. On March 5, 2013, the United States filed an
22
Objection to the Notice of Newly Discovered Pertinent Authority.
23
9.
Prior to the resolution by the Court of the pending motions, on April 23, 2013,
24
the parties file a Notice of Settlement, and on May 10, 2013, filed the Proposed Order for
25
final Judgment of Forfeiture and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture.
26
27
28
10.
Thereafter, and prior to the Court’s issuance of the Order for Final Judgment
of Forfeiture, Claimant died.
11.
On October 30, 2013, Claimant’s counsel filed a Suggestion of Death.
29
30
2
Final Judgment of Forfeiture
1
12.
Thereafter, on December 20, 2013, the Court issued its Order on the pending
2
Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Amend, allowing the United States to file an Amended
3
Complaint.
4
13.
On December 20, 2013, the First Amended Verified Complaint was filed.
5
14.
On December 31, 2013, the Clerk issued an Amended Warrant for Arrest for
6
7
the defendant currency. The Amended Warrant was duly executed on January 6, 2014.
15.
Beginning on February 5, 2014, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United
8
States published notice of the amended action on the official government forfeiture site
9
www.forfeiture.gov. The Declaration of Publication was filed on March 7, 2014.
10
16.
Service of the Amended Complaint and Amended Warrant for Arrest of
11
Articles In Rem was effectuated on potential claimant Jorge Luis Tostado Delgado. No
12
claim was filed by or on behalf of Jorge Luis Tostado Delgado. The Clerk of the Court
13
entered a Clerk’s Certificate of Entry of Default against Jorge Luis Tostado Delgado on
14
March 12, 2014. The United States and Claimant also join in a request that as part of the
15
Final Judgment of Forfeiture in this case the Court thereafter enter a default judgment
16
against the interest, if any, of Jorge Luis Tostado Delgado.
17
18
17.
No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time in
which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired.
19
Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby
20
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
21
1.
22
23
24
25
The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into
by and between the parties to this action.
2.
That judgment is hereby entered against Felix Velasco, Jorge Luis Tostado
Delgado, and all other potential claimants.
3.
After entry by the Court of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein, $46,200.00
26
of the defendant approximately $77,000.00 in U.S. Currency, together with any interest
27
that has accrued on the entire $77,000.00, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant
28
to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law.
29
30
3
Final Judgment of Forfeiture
1
4.
After entry by the Court of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein, but no later
2
than 60 days after Claimant has provided the necessary electronic funds transfer
3
paperwork, $30,800.00 of the defendant approximately $77,000.00 in U.S. Currency shall be
4
returned to Claimant, through his attorney of record, Edward M. Burch, Law Offices of
5
David Michael, One Sansome Street, Suite 3500, San Francisco, California 94104,
6
telephone (415) 946-8996.
7
5.
That the parties and their servants, agents, and employees and all other public
8
entities, their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and all liability
9
arising out of or in any way connected with the seizure, arrest, or forfeiture of the defendant
10
currency. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unanticipated
11
injuries, and/or damages arising out of said seizure, arrest, or forfeiture, as well as to those
12
now known or disclosed. The parties waived the provisions of California Civil Code § 1542.
13
6.
That pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and the allegations set forth in
14
the Complaint filed on July 28, 2011, and the Amended Complaint filed on December 20,
15
2013, the Court finds that there was probable cause for arrest and seizure of the defendant
16
currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a
17
Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 shall be entered accordingly.
18
7.
All parties are to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees.
19
8.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Hon. Gary S.
20
Austin, District Court Magistrate Judge, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of
21
this Final Judgment of Forfeiture.
22
9.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
23
SO ORDERED THIS 25 day of April, 2014.
24
25
d
/s/ Gary S. Austin
GARY S. AUSTIN
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE
Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint filed July 28, 2011, the First
29
30
4
Final Judgment of Forfeiture
1
Amended Complaint filed December 20, 2013, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of
2
Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28
3
U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the defendant
4
currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 25, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
5
Final Judgment of Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?