Renato Quezada v. Maurice Junious, et al

Filing 10

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Regarding Exhaustion signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 08/01/2011. Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2011. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

RENATO D. QUEZADA,

Case: No. 1:11-cv-01254-GBC (PC)

10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING
EXHAUSTION

Plaintiff,
11
v.

(Doc. 3)

12
MAURICE JUNIOUS, et al.,
13
14

Defendants.
/

15
16

I.

17

Renato D. Quezada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18

in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 16, 2011, Plaintiff filed the

19

original complaint. (Doc. 3). On the form complaint, Plaintiff concedes that he has not exhausted

20

administrative remedies stating that the outcome is still pending. (Doc. 3 at 2).

Factual and Procedural Background

21

II.

22

Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, "[n]o action shall be brought with

23

respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner

24

confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are

25

available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Prisoners are required to exhaust the available

26

administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Jones v. Bock, 127 S.Ct. 910, 918-19 (2007); McKinney

27

v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1201 (9th Cir. 2002). The Court must dismiss a case without

28

prejudice even when there is exhaustion while the suit is pending. Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164,

Exhaustion Requirement

1

1

1170 (9th Cir. 2005).

2

Exhaustion is required regardless of the relief sought by the prisoner. Booth v. Churner, 532

3

U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819 (2001). A prisoner “must use all steps the prison holds out, enabling

4

the prison to reach the merits of the issue.” Griffin v. Arpaio, 557 F.3d 1117, 1119 (9th Cir. 2009);

5

see also Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005). A prisoner’s concession to

6

non-exhaustion is valid grounds for dismissal so long as no exception to exhaustion applies. 42

7

U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir. 2003).

8

The Court takes judicial notice of the fact that the California Department of Corrections and

9

Rehabilitation has an administrative grievance system for prisoner complaints. Cal. Code Regs., tit.

10

15 § 3084.1 (2008). The process is initiated by submitting a CDC Form 602. Id. at § 3084.2(a).

11

Four levels of appeal are involved, including the informal level, first formal level, second formal

12

level, and third formal level, also known as the “Director's Level.” Id. at § 3084.5. Appeals must

13

be submitted within fifteen working days of the event being appealed, and the process is initiated by

14

submission of the appeal to the informal level, or in some circumstances, the first formal level. Id.

15

at §§ 3084.5, 3084.6(c).

16

In order to satisfy section 1997e(a), California state prisoners are required to use the available

17

process to exhaust their claims prior to filing suit. Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 126 S.Ct. 2378,

18

2383 (2006); McKinney, 311 F.3d at 1199-1201. “[E]xhaustion is mandatory under the PLRA and

19

. . . unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.” Jones, 127 S.Ct. at 918-19 (citing Porter, 435

20

U.S. at 524). “All ‘available’ remedies must now be exhausted; those remedies need not meet

21

federal standards, nor must they be ‘plain, speedy, and effective.’” Porter, 534 U.S. at 524 (quoting

22

Booth, 532 U.S. at 739 n.5). In this instance, Plaintiff conceded that he has not exhausted

23

administrative remedies.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
2

1

III.

Conclusion and Order

2

Because it is apparent that Plaintiff has not completed the grievance process, the Court

3

HEREBY ORDERS: Plaintiff SHALL SHOW CAUSE why the action should not be dismissed

4

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies withing thirty (30) days of the date of service of

5

this order.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated:
0jh02o

August 1, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3