Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 139

STIPULATION for Filing of Defendant Gregory Smith's Amended (1) Answer to Fourth Amended Complaint; (2) CounterClaims Against Plaintiff's; (3) Cross-Claims Against Other Defendants; and (4) Demand for Jury Trial, to Correct Typographical Errors; and ORDER thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/27/2013. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 LORI J. GUALCO, ESQ. (Bar No. 95232) GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall, Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 930-0700 Facsimile: (916) 930-0705 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant Gregory Smith 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA, Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM 11 STIPULATION FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT GREGORY SMITH’S AMENDED (1) ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; (3) CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS; AND (4) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL, TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS; AND ORDER THEREON Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. GREGORY SMITH, an individual, RICHARD LASTER, an individual, THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST; JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS A/K/A THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS; HARLEY MILLER, an individual; CHERYL MILLER, an individual; MARTIN AND MARTIN PROPERTIES; CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY; the CITY OF VISALIA, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, 19 20 21 Defendants. RICHARD LASTER, individually, and formerly doing business as PARAGON CLEANERS, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Counter-Complainant and Cross-Complainant, v. VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA, THE ESTATE OF JANE HIGGINS NASH AS FORMER EXECUTRIX UNDER THE WILL OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, Deceased; DAVID H. NASH, SUCCESSOR COTRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM P. NASH JR. AND JANE H. NASH REVOCABLE TRUST; RICHARD P. NASH AS SUCCESSOR CO1 STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING SMITH TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 3 TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM P. NASH JR. AND JANE H. NASH REVOCABLE TRUST; NASH PROPERTIES, LLC., a California Limited Liability Company, Counter-Defendants and Cross-Defendants. 4 5 6 7 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS Defendant Gregory Smith (“Smith”), by and through his attorney of record, Gualco Law 8 and Lori J. Gualco, Plaintiffs Viola Coppola, Gary Coppola and the Trust of Anthony M. 9 Coppola (collectively “Coppola”) by and through their attorneys of record, Greben & Associates 10 and Jan A. Greben, and Defendants The Estate of Jane Higgins Nash as Former Executrix Under 11 the Will of Mabel Elaine Higgins, Deceased, David H. Nash, Successor Co-Trustee of the 12 William P. Nash Jr. and Jane H. Nash Revocable Trust, Richard P. Nash as Successor Co- 13 Trustee of the William P. Nash Jr. and Jane H. Nash Revocable Trust and Nash Properties, LLC., 14 a California Limited Liability Company (collectively “Nash”), by and through their attorneys of 15 record, Williams, Brodersen & Pritchett LLP and Steven R. Williams, hereby stipulate and agree 16 as follows: 17 Smith may file an Amended (1) Answer to Fourth Amended Complaint; (2) 18 Counterclaims Against Plaintiffs; (3) Cross-Claims Against Other Defendants; and (4) Demand 19 for Jury Trial, attached hereto as Exhibit A, in order to correct the following typographical errors: 20 1. The last paragraph of the Counterclaims, numbered Paragraph “42” on Page 23, 21 22 which paragraph should be renumbered Paragraph “48”. 2. Renumbering the paragraphs in the Cross-Claims beginning on Page 23, under 23 Common Allegations, Paragraph “48” should be renumbered Paragraph “49” and 24 continuing through the Cross-Claims and ending with Paragraph “96” on Page 32. 25 3. The title of the “Fourth” Counterclaim on Page 17 be corrected to read the “Third” 26 27 28 GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Counterclaim (Contribution under CERCLA § 113(f)). 4. The title of the “Fourth” Cross-Claim on Page 26 be corrected to read the “Third” Cross-Claim (Contribution under CERCLA § 113(f)). 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING SMITH TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 5. In the Prayer, the heading reading “First, Second, Fourth and Fourth Counterclaims” on Page 32, be corrected to read “First, Second, Third and Fourth Counterclaims”. 3 6. In the Prayer, the heading reading “First, Second, Fourth and Fourth Cross-Claims” 4 on page 33, be corrected to read “First, Second, Third and Fourth Cross-Claims”. 5 6 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: June 17, 2013 GUALCO LAW 7 8 By: /s/ Lori J. Gualco LORI J. GUALCO Attorney for Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Cross-Defendant Gregory Smith 9 10 Dated: June 17, 2013 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 11 12 By: /s/ Jan A. Greben (as authorized on 6/17/13) JAN A. GREBEN Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Viola Coppola, Gary Coppola and the Trust of Anthony M. Coppola 13 14 15 Dated: June 11, 2013 WILLIAMS, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT LLP 16 17 18 By: /s/ Steven R. Williams (as auth. on 6/11/13) STEVEN R. WILLIAMS Attorneys for Nash Defendants 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING SMITH TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 ORDER 2 Based on the above stipulation, and good cause shown, the Court orders that Defendant 3 Gregory Smith be allowed to file the Amended (1) Answer to Fourth Amended Complaint; (2) 4 Counterclaims Against Plaintiffs; (3) Cross-Claims Against Other Defendants; and (4) Demand 5 for Jury Trial. Smith shall file any amended pleading as a separate document(s) in the Court’s 6 file. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: /s/ Barbara June 27, 2013 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING SMITH TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?