Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 220

Stiuplation to Dismiss, without Prejudice, California Water Service Company's Counter Claim Relating to Punitive Damages Only; ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/3/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 125 E. DE LA GUERRA ST., STE 203 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 TEL: 805-963-9090 FAX: 805-963-9098 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jan A. Greben, SBN 103464 jan@grebenlaw.com Brett A. Boon, SBN 283225 brett@grebenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST, Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF 13 ANTHONY M. COPPOLA; 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 GREGORY SMITH, an individual; RICHARD STIPULATION TO DISMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY’S COUNTER CLAIM RELATING TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES ONLY ORDER LASTER, an individual; and THE JANE HIGGINS 17 NASH TRUST; JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS, 18 HARLEY MILLER, an individual; CHERYL MILLER, an individual; MARTIN AND MARTIN 19 PROPERTIES, BENART MAIN STREET PROPERTIES, CAL WATER SERVICE 20 COMPANY, the CITY OF VISALIA, NASH PROPERTIES LLC [DOE #1], DAVID H. NASH, 21 as the successor co-trustee of the WILLIAM P. NASH and JANE H. NASH REVOCABLE TRUST 22 [DOE #2], RICHARD P. NASH, as the successor co-trustee of the WILLIAM P. NASH and JANE H. 23 NASH REVOCABLE TRUST [DOE #3], and 24 DOES 4-20, inclusive; Defendants. 25 RELATED CROSS AND COUNTER26 CLAIMS 27 28 /// -1STIPULATION TO DISSMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [PROPOSED] ORDER 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM 1 Plaintiffs and counter defendants Gary Coppola, the Viola Coppola Irrevocable Trust, and 2 the Anthony M. Coppola Trust (collectively “Coppola”), and defendant and counterclaimant 3 California Water Service Company (“Cal Water”) hereby stipulate and request the Court to enter an 4 order as follows. 5 6 Whereas, on May 27, 2014 Cal Water filed a Counterclaim against Coppola, filed as Document 216. The Counterclaim includes a request for punitive damages against Coppola. 7 Whereas, the Court previously dismissed another defendant's, Martin and Martin Properties, 8 counterclaim for punitive damages against Coppola on November 12, 2013, the Order filed as 9 Document 147. 10 Coppola and Cal Water hereby stipulate and request that the Court order that Cal Water’s 11 Counterclaim as it relates to relief of punitive damages, only be dismissed without prejudice. 12 Specifically, Paragraphs 39, 44 and Section (e) of the Prayer for Relief shall be dismissed from Cal 13 Water’s Counterclaim. 14 15 16 17 Coppola shall file a responsive pleading within ten (10) days of this Order or June 17, 2014, the current deadline to file a response, whichever is later. It is hereby stipulated. Dated: June 3, 2014 18 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES /s/ Jan A. Greben Jan A. Greben Brett A. Boon Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIOLA COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST, GARY COPPOLA, and the TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: June 3, 2014 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP /s/ Patrick S. Schoenburg David F. Wood Patrick S. Schoenburg Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 28 -2STIPULATION TO DISSMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [PROPOSED] ORDER 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM 1 2 3 4 5 ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Paragraphs 39, 44 and Section (e) of the prayer for Relief are hereby dismissed from Cal Water’s Counter claim without prejudice. 2. Coppola shall file a responsive pleading within (10) days of this Order or June 17, 2014, the 6 current deadline to file a response, whichever is later. 7 3. This action remains pending as to the remaining claims. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO DISSMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [PROPOSED] ORDER 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?