Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al
Filing
374
STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Expert Witness Scheduling Deadlines: (1) Expert Disclosures: June 24, 2016 ; (2) Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: July 22, 2016. All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set for September 16, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/3/2016. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
125 E. DE LA GUERRA ST., STE 203
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101
TEL: 805-963-9090
FAX: 805-963-9098
Jan A. Greben, SBN 103464
jan@grebenlaw.com
Christine M. Monroe, SBN 304573
christine@grebenlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR
TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA,
as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
GARY COPPOLA, an individual, GARY
COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF
THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE
TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE
OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST;
14
Plaintiffs,
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING EXPERT WITNESS
SCHEDULING DEADLINES
v.
16
Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
PARAGON CLEANERS (formerly sued as
GREGORY SMITH, an individual); et al.
17
18
Defendants.
19
RELATED CROSS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS
20
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Gary Coppola, Gary Coppola as
23
successor trustee of the Viola M. Coppola Irrevocable Trust, and Gary Coppola as trustee of the
24
Anthony M. Coppola Trust; Defendant Richard Laster; Defendant Paragon Cleaners, Inc.;
25
Defendants the Jane Higgins Nash Trust, Jane Nash as Executor of the Estate of Decatur Higgins
26
AKA the Estate of Mabel Elaine Higgins, Nash Properties LLC, David H. Nash and Richard P. Nash
27
as the successor trustees of the Jane Nash Trust, a trust created under the terms of the Last Will and
28
Testament of Mabel Elaine Higgins, formerly known as the Mabel Elaine Higgins Testamentary
-1STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING
1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
1
Trust and commonly known as the Jane Higgins Nash Trust; as well as Defendant California Water
2
Service Company; Defendant City of Visalia; Defendant Martin and Martin Properties LLC; and
3
Defendant Visalia Unified School District (collectively “Parties”)
4
5
6
The Parties hereby agree and stipulate to extend the expert discovery deadlines set forth in
the Court’s Scheduling Order [Doc 320] as follows.
-
7
8
9
Initial Expert Witness Disclosures, currently scheduled for June 10, 2016, shall be moved
to June 24, 2016.
-
Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosures, currently scheduled for July 8, 2016, shall be
moved to July 22, 2016.
10
All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set
11
for September 16, 2016. The parties stipulate in good faith and request that the Court adopt this
12
modified schedule.
13
14
Dated: March 3, 2016
15
GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
16
/s/ Jan A. Greben
Jan A. Greben
Christine M. Monroe
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter Defendants
GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY
COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF
THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE
TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE
OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: March 3, 2016
GUALCO LAW
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
/s/ Lori J. Gualco
Lori J. Gualco
Attorney for Defendant RICHARD LASTER
28
-2STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING
1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
1
2
Dated: March 3, 2016
GUALCO LAW
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
3
/s/ Lori J. Gualco
4
Lori J. Gualco
Attorney for Defendant PARAGON
CLEANERS, INC.
5
6
7
8
Dated: March 3, 2016
9
WILLIAMS, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT
LLP
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
10
/s/ Steven R. Williams
Steven R. Williams
Attorney for Defendants THE JANE HIGGINS
NASH TRUST; JANE NASH, as EXECUTOR
OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS
AKA THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE
HIGGINS; NASH PROPERTIES, LLC; and
DAVID H. NASH, and RICHARD P. NASH, as
the SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES OF THE JANE
NASH TRUST, a trust created under the terms of
the Last Will and Testament of Mabel Elaine
Higgins, formerly known as the Mabel Elaine
Higgins Testamentary Trust and commonly
known as the Jane Higgins Nash Trust
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Dated: March 3, 2016
22
WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
23
24
25
/s/ Patrick S. Schoenburg
David F. Wood
Patrick S. Schoenburg
Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA
WATER SERVICE COMPANY
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING
1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
1
Dated: March 3, 2016
2
HERR, PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP
(Authorized on: February 29, 2016)
3
/s/ Ron Statler
Leonard C. Herr
Ron Statler
Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: March 3, 2016
ALLEN, MATKINS, LECK, GAMBLE,
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
9
(Authorized on: February 25, 2016)
10
/s/ Tim C. Hsu
Emily L. Murray
Tim C. Hsu
Attorneys for Defendant MARTIN AND
MARTIN PROPERTIES, LLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: March 3, 2016
17
NELSON & ROZIER
(Authorized on: February 26, 2016)
18
19
20
/s/ Clayton Christenson
John L. Rozier
Clayton Christenson
Attorneys for Defendant VISALIA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING
1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
ORDER
1
The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to modify the scheduling order
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
deadlines finds that good cause exists to continue the expert discovery deadlines to the following
dates:
1.
Expert Disclosures:
June 24, 2016
2.
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
July 22, 2016
All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set
for September 16, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
11
March 3, 2016
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING
1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?