Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 374

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Expert Witness Scheduling Deadlines: (1) Expert Disclosures: June 24, 2016 ; (2) Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: July 22, 2016. All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set for September 16, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/3/2016. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 125 E. DE LA GUERRA ST., STE 203 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 TEL: 805-963-9090 FAX: 805-963-9098 Jan A. Greben, SBN 103464 jan@grebenlaw.com Christine M. Monroe, SBN 304573 christine@grebenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 GARY COPPOLA, an individual, GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST; 14 Plaintiffs, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING DEADLINES v. 16 Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM PARAGON CLEANERS (formerly sued as GREGORY SMITH, an individual); et al. 17 18 Defendants. 19 RELATED CROSS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Gary Coppola, Gary Coppola as 23 successor trustee of the Viola M. Coppola Irrevocable Trust, and Gary Coppola as trustee of the 24 Anthony M. Coppola Trust; Defendant Richard Laster; Defendant Paragon Cleaners, Inc.; 25 Defendants the Jane Higgins Nash Trust, Jane Nash as Executor of the Estate of Decatur Higgins 26 AKA the Estate of Mabel Elaine Higgins, Nash Properties LLC, David H. Nash and Richard P. Nash 27 as the successor trustees of the Jane Nash Trust, a trust created under the terms of the Last Will and 28 Testament of Mabel Elaine Higgins, formerly known as the Mabel Elaine Higgins Testamentary -1STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM 1 Trust and commonly known as the Jane Higgins Nash Trust; as well as Defendant California Water 2 Service Company; Defendant City of Visalia; Defendant Martin and Martin Properties LLC; and 3 Defendant Visalia Unified School District (collectively “Parties”) 4 5 6 The Parties hereby agree and stipulate to extend the expert discovery deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order [Doc 320] as follows. - 7 8 9 Initial Expert Witness Disclosures, currently scheduled for June 10, 2016, shall be moved to June 24, 2016. - Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosures, currently scheduled for July 8, 2016, shall be moved to July 22, 2016. 10 All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set 11 for September 16, 2016. The parties stipulate in good faith and request that the Court adopt this 12 modified schedule. 13 14 Dated: March 3, 2016 15 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) 16 /s/ Jan A. Greben Jan A. Greben Christine M. Monroe Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter Defendants GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: March 3, 2016 GUALCO LAW (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) /s/ Lori J. Gualco Lori J. Gualco Attorney for Defendant RICHARD LASTER 28 -2STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM 1 2 Dated: March 3, 2016 GUALCO LAW (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) 3 /s/ Lori J. Gualco 4 Lori J. Gualco Attorney for Defendant PARAGON CLEANERS, INC. 5 6 7 8 Dated: March 3, 2016 9 WILLIAMS, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT LLP (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) 10 /s/ Steven R. Williams Steven R. Williams Attorney for Defendants THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST; JANE NASH, as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS AKA THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS; NASH PROPERTIES, LLC; and DAVID H. NASH, and RICHARD P. NASH, as the SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES OF THE JANE NASH TRUST, a trust created under the terms of the Last Will and Testament of Mabel Elaine Higgins, formerly known as the Mabel Elaine Higgins Testamentary Trust and commonly known as the Jane Higgins Nash Trust 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: March 3, 2016 22 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) 23 24 25 /s/ Patrick S. Schoenburg David F. Wood Patrick S. Schoenburg Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM 1 Dated: March 3, 2016 2 HERR, PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP (Authorized on: February 29, 2016) 3 /s/ Ron Statler Leonard C. Herr Ron Statler Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: March 3, 2016 ALLEN, MATKINS, LECK, GAMBLE, MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 9 (Authorized on: February 25, 2016) 10 /s/ Tim C. Hsu Emily L. Murray Tim C. Hsu Attorneys for Defendant MARTIN AND MARTIN PROPERTIES, LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: March 3, 2016 17 NELSON & ROZIER (Authorized on: February 26, 2016) 18 19 20 /s/ Clayton Christenson John L. Rozier Clayton Christenson Attorneys for Defendant VISALIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM ORDER 1 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to modify the scheduling order 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 deadlines finds that good cause exists to continue the expert discovery deadlines to the following dates: 1. Expert Disclosures: June 24, 2016 2. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: July 22, 2016 All other deadlines remain unchanged, including the close of expert discovery which is set for September 16, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 11 March 3, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5STIPULATION & ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS SCHEDULING 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?