Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION and ORDER Granting Extension of Time for California Water Service Company to Respond to Second Amended Complaint: by 8/27/2012. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/19/2012. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

GREGORY R. MCCLINTOCK - State Bar No. 43987
[e-mail]
NOAH PERCH-AHERN - State Bar No. 262164
[e-mail]
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for
Defendant California Water Service Company
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO

8
9
10
11

VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA,
and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M.
COPPOLA,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,
v.
GREGORY SMITH, an individual,
RICHARD LASTER, an individual, and
THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST,
JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE
ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS
A/K/A THE ESTATE OF MABEL
ELAINE HIGGINS, HARLEY MILLER,
an individual, CHERYL MILLER, an
individual, MARTIN AND MARTIN
PROPERTIES, BENART MAIN
STREET PROPERTIES, CAL WATER
SERVICE COMPANY, the CITY OF
VISALIA and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

773610

AND RELATED COUNTER AND
CROSS CLAIMS.

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR CALIFORNIA WATER
SERVICE COMPANY TO
RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between defendant California Water

2

Service Company (“Cal Water”) and plaintiffs Viola Coppola, Gary Coppola, and the

3

Trust of Anthony M. Coppola (“Plaintiffs”) that the deadline for Cal Water to respond

4

to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) shall be extended by a period of

5

twenty-eight (28) days. Cal Water was served with the SAC on July 9, 2012, and the

6

original deadline for Cal Water’s responsive pleading was twenty-one (21) days later,

7

July 30, 2012. Based upon this Stipulation, Cal Water’s deadline to respond to the

8

SAC is now August 27, 2012.

9
10

This Stipulation comports with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local
Rule 144.

11
12
13
14
15
16

DATED: July 18, 2012

GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Noah Perch-Ahern
GREG MCCLINTOCK
NOAH PERCH-AHERN
Attorneys for
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
COMPANY

1

DATED: July 18, 2012

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

2

By: /s/ Jan. A. Greben
JAN A. GREBEN
JEFF COYNER
DANIELLE DE SMETH
Attorneys for
VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA
AND THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M.
COPPOLA

3
4
5
6
7
8

ORDER

9
10

Pursuant to Stipulation between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

11

Defendant California Water Service Company’s amended answer is due on or before

12
13

August 27, 2012.

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
17

Dated:

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

July 19, 2012

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

10c20kb8554