Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 508

ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Request for DISMISSAL by Richard Laster, Paragon Cleaners, Inc., The Coppola Parties, and the Nash Parties, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/18/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LORI J. GUALCO (Bar No. 95232) GUALCO LAW 400 Capitol Mall, Eleventh Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 930-0700 Fax: (916) 930-0705 Attorney for Defendant RICHARD LASTER 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 11 12 GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL BY RICHARD LASTER, PARAGON CLEANERS, INC., THE COPPOLA PARTIES, AND THE NASH PARTIES Plaintiffs, v. PARAGON CLEANERS, INC. (formerly sued as GREGORY SMITH, an individual); RICHARD LASTER, an individual; et al., 17 18 19 Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2) and (c); the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release; and the Court’s Orders approving the Good Faith Settlements and Vacating Hearing Date of: (1) Defendant Richard Laster [document 506]; (2) Defendant Paragon Cleaners, Inc. [document 504] and (3) Defendants the Nash Parties [document 505]; the following parties: Plaintiffs Gary Coppola, Gary Coppola, as Successor Trustee Of the Viola M. Coppola Irrevocable Trust, and Gary Coppola, as Trustee of the 27 Anthony M. Coppola Trust (hereinafter collectively “Coppola”); Defendant, Cross-Complainant, 28 and Counter-Claimant Paragon Cleaners, Inc. (hereinafter “Paragon”); Defendant, Cross1 1 2 3 4 5 Complainant, and Counter-Claimant Richard Laster (hereinafter “Laster”); Defendants and Cross-Defendants the Estate of Decatur Higgins, Deceased, the Estate of Mabel Elaine Higgins, Deceased, Nash Properties, LLC, David H. Nash as successor co-trustee of the Jane Nash Trust, and Richard P. Nash as successor co-trustee of the Jane Nash Trust (hereinafter collectively “the Nash Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree through their respective attorneys of record as follows: 6 1. Coppola’s Eighth Amended Complaint in the above captioned action is hereby 7 dismissed with prejudice, including their entire action and all claims encompassed 8 therein, against only Laster, Paragon, and the Nash Parties. 9 2. The Nash Parties’ counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are 10 hereby dismissed with prejudice, including their entire action and all claims 11 encompassed therein, against Laster, Paragon, and Coppola. 12 3. Laster’s counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are hereby 13 dismissed with prejudice, including his entire action and all claims encompassed 14 therein, against Coppola and the Nash Parties. 15 4. Paragon’s counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are hereby 16 dismissed with prejudice, including its entire action and all claims encompassed 17 therein, against Coppola and the Nash Parties. 18 5. Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 19 6. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for purposes of enforcing the 20 settlement agreement. 21 7. The foregoing dismissals are voluntary and shall not operate as an adjudication on the 22 merits. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: October 16, 2017 3 GUALCO LAW By: /s/ Lori J. Gualco LORI J. GUALCO Attorney for RICHARD LASTER 4 5 6 Dated: October 16, 2017 7 GUALCO LAW By: /s/ Lori J. Gualco LORI J. GUALCO Attorney for PARAGON CLEANERS, INC. 8 9 10 11 Dated: October 18, 2017 12 By: /s/ Jan A. Greben as authorized 10/18/17 JAN A. GREBEN CHRISTINE M. MONROE Attorneys for GARY COPPOLA, an individual; GARY COPPOLA, as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIOLA M. COPPOLA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; and GARY COPPOLA, as TRUSTEE OF THE ANTHONY M. COPPOLA TRUST 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES Dated: October 16, 2017 WILLIAMS, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT LLP By: /s/ Steven R. Williams as authorized 10/16/17 STEVEN R. WILLIAMS Attorneys for THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST; JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS A/K/A THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS; NASH PROPERTIES LLC [DOE # 1]; DAVID H. NASH, as the successor co-trustee of the WILLIAM P. NASH AND JANE H. NASH REVOCABLE TRUST [DOE # 2]; and RICHARD P. NASH, as the successor co-trustee of the WILLIAM P. NASH and JANE H. NASH REVOCABLE TRUST [DOE # 3] 28 3 1 ORDER 2 3 The Parties having stipulated and agreed, and good cause appearing thereon, it is hereby ORDERED: 4 1. Coppola’s Eighth Amended Complaint in the above captioned action is dismissed 5 with prejudice, including their entire action and all claims encompassed therein, 6 against only Laster, Paragon, and the Nash Parties. 7 2. The Nash Parties’ counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are 8 dismissed with prejudice, including their entire action and all claims encompassed 9 therein, against Laster, Paragon, and Coppola. 10 3. Laster’s counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are dismissed 11 with prejudice, including his entire action and all claims encompassed therein, 12 against Coppola and the Nash Parties. 13 4. Paragon’s counter-claims and cross-claims in the above captioned action are 14 dismissed with prejudice, including its entire action and all claims encompassed 15 therein, against Coppola and the Nash Parties. 16 5. Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 17 6. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for purposes of enforcing the 18 settlement agreement. 19 7. The foregoing dismissals are voluntary and shall not operate as an adjudication on the 20 merits. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2017 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?