Viola Coppola, et al v. Gregory Smith, et al

Filing 87

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant City of Visalia to Respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. Based on the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court orders as follows: (1) Should the Court grant the City� 39;s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff's shall file an amended complaint and the time to respond shall be determined by ordinary rules of civil procedure in this Court; (2) Should the Court deny the City's motions to dismiss or grant the motions without leave to amend, City shall file an answer within 7 calendar days after the Court enters an order denying the motions. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/18/2012. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 4 Leonard C. Herr, #081896 Ron Statler, #234177 DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON Attorneys at Law, LLP 100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300 Visalia, California 93291 Telephone: (559) 636-0200 5 Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA 2 3 EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES [Gov. Code §6103] 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. Case No.: 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF VISALIA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT GREGORY SMITH, an individual, RICHARD LASTER, an individual; and THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST; JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS A/K/A THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, HARLEY MILLER, an individual, CHERYL MILLER, an individual, MARTIN AND MARTIN PROPERTIES, BENART MAIN STREET PROPERTIES, CAL WATER SERVICE COMPANY, the CITY OF VISALIA and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________________ AND RELATED COUNTER AND CROSS-CLAIMS. 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES DOOLEY HERR PELTZER & RICHARDSON, Attorneys at Law, LLP 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF VISALIA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiffs and Defendant City of Visalia do hereby enter into the following 2 stipulation and ask that this Court enter an Order extending the time for City of 3 Visalia to respond to the Third Amended Complaint as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RECITALS WHEREAS, the parties have once before entered into a stipulation regarding the time to respond, and WHEREAS, the earlier stipulation recognized pending motions to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the Second Amended Complaint, and WHEREAS, the earlier stipulation called for an answer on September 12, 2012, and 11 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that economy of litigation is served by 12 extending the time to respond to the Third Amended Complaint until after 13 resolution of the motions to dismiss. 14 15 16 17 STIPULATION Plaintiffs and City do hereby stipulate that the time for City to file a response shall be determined as follows: 1. Should the Court grant the City’s motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall 18 file an amended complaint and the time to respond shall be determined by 19 ordinary rules of civil procedure in this Court. 20 2. Should the Court deny the City’s motions to dismiss or grant the 21 motions without leave to amend, City shall file an answer within 7 calendar days 22 after the Court enters an order denying the motions. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 DATED: September 14, 2012 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES DOOLEY HERR PELTZER & RICHARDSON, Attorneys at Law, LLP 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 By: /s/ Jan A. Greben JAN A GREBEN Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CrossDefendants, Viola Coppola, Gary Coppola and The Trust of Anthony M. Coppola 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF VISALIA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 DATED: September 14, 2012 DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON, LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Leonard C. Herr LEONARD C. HERR, Attorney for Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA 6 ORDER 7 Based on the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court 8 9 orders as follows: 10 1. Should the Court grant the City’s motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall file an 11 amended complaint and the time to respond shall be determined by 12 ordinary rules of civil procedure in this Court; 13 2. Should the Court deny the City’s motions to dismiss or grant the motions 14 without leave to amend, City shall file an answer within 7 calendar days 15 after the Court enters an order denying the motions. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: /s/ Barbara September 18, 2012 A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature - EN D: 10c20kb8554 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES DOOLEY HERR PELTZER & RICHARDSON, Attorneys at Law, LLP 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF VISALIA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?