Calloway v. Adams et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/15/2014 denying 8 Motion for Transfer as moot. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
1:11-cv-01281-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
TRANSFER AS MOOT
(Doc. 8.)
D. G. ADAMS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner in the custody of the California
18
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with
19
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing
20
this action on August 3, 2011.
21
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), and no other parties
22
have made an appearance. (Doc. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local
23
Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all
24
proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local
25
Rule Appendix A(k)(3).
26
(Doc. 1.)
On August 16, 2011, Plaintiff consented to
On September 26, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to be transferred from the custody of
27
Corcoran State Prison and Davita Health Care. (Doc. 8.)
28
///
1
1
Plaintiff’s motion is moot because the court record shows that on or about November
2
28, 2013, Plaintiff was transferred from CSP in Corcoran, California to the California Health
3
Care Facility in Stockton, California. (Notice of Change of Address, Doc. 9.) Therefore,
4
Plaintiff’s motion must be denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for transfer, filed on
5
6
September 26, 2013, is DENIED as moot.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
11
12
13
January 15, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?