Dixon v. Wesbrook, et al.
Filing
21
ORDER VACATING the March 12, 2012, hearing before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on defendants' Motion to Dismiss, document 18 , and deeming it suitable for decision without oral argument. The matter will be taken under submission as of that date; order signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/8/2012. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DENISA DIXON,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
B.P.D. OFFICERS WESBROOK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
NO. 1:11-CV-01290 AWI JLT
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
ORDER VACATING HEARING
DATE OF MARCH 12, 2012
AND TAKING MATTER
UNDER SUBMISSION
14
15
Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss. The matter was
16
scheduled for hearing to be held on March 12, 2012. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiff was
17
required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than February 28,
18
2012. Plaintiff failed to do so.
19
Due to Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, she is in
20
violation of the Local Rules. Plaintiff is further not entitled to be heard at oral argument in
21
opposition to the motion. See Local Rule 230(c). The court has reviewed Defendants’ motion
22
and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral
23
argument. See Local Rule 230(g).
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of March 12,
2
2012 is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of March 12, 2012, the court will
3
take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
0m8i78
March 8, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?