Stanislaus Towing & Recovery Services, INC., et al v City of Modesto, et al
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Dismiss Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/3/2012. Show Cause Response due by 10/10/2012. (Jessen, A)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STANISLAUS TOWING & RECOVERY
SERVICES, INC., et al.,
CASE NO. CV F 11-1344 LJO DLB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO
CITY OF MODESTO, et al.,
This Court’s August 30, 2012 minute order set a 30-day deadline for the parties to file papers to
dismiss this action. The parties have failed to comply with the minute order. This Court’s Local Rule
110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds for imposition by the
Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”
Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than October 10, 2012, to file papers to
show cause why sanctions, including dismissal of this action with or without prejudice and monetary
sanctions against counsel and/or plaintiffs, should not be imposed for failure to comply with the
February 15, 2012 order. This order to show cause will be discharged if, no later than October 10, 2012,
papers are filed to dismiss this action in its entirety.
Moreover, if the parties fail to complete settlement, this Court will explore resetting trial as soon
as possible and if necessary, reassigning this action to another district judge, including one from the
Sacramento division or another district, to expedite trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 3, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?