Stanislaus Towing & Recovery Services, INC., et al v City of Modesto, et al

Filing 48

ORDER To Deny Dismissal (Doc. 47 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/17/2012. This Court ADMONISHES counsel to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders. This Court FURTHER ADMONISHES counsel that failure to comply with this order will result in imposition of sanctions.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANISLAUS TOWING & RECOVERY SERVICES, INC, et al., CASE NO. CV F 11-1344 LJO DLB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 ORDER TO DENY DISMISSAL (Doc. 47.) vs. CITY OF MODESTO, et al., Defendant. / 16 17 This Court has devoted inordinate time and resources to monitor settlement and attempted 18 dismissal of this action. This Court is required to devote more time and resources given the parties’ 19 failure to file proper papers to dismiss this action. 20 Plaintiff filed an October 16, 2012 document (“October 16 document”) to attempt to dismiss this 21 action and which fails to comply with this Court’s October 9 and 13, 2012 orders. The October 16 22 document fails to comply with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires a stipulation signed by 23 defendants who have answered or filed a summary judgment motion. The October 16 document is 24 plaintiffs’ attempt to unilaterally dismiss this action, and lacks the necessary the signature of defense 25 counsel. As such, this Court DENIES dismissal of this action in the absence of compliance with 26 F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court again ORDERS the parties, no later than October 31, 2012, to 27 file either: (a) a stipulation which satisfies F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and a proposed order to dismiss 28 this action in its entirety; or (b) papers to show good cause why the parties have failed to comply with 1 1 F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 2 This Court ADMONISHES counsel to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this 3 Court’s Local Rules and orders. This Court FURTHER ADMONISHES counsel that failure to comply 4 with this order in the absence of good cause will result in imposition of sanctions, including monetary 5 sanctions and/or dismissal of this action with or without prejudice. As it stands, this Court contemplates 6 to sanction each party and/or its counsel a minimum of $1,000 if the parties fail to satisfy this order. 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 66h44d October 17, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?