Clifton Perry v. Acting Warden Michael Martel
Filing
5
ORDER Granting Application for Appointment of Counsel 1 and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 , 3 ; DENYING Without Prejudice Request for Stay of Execution 1 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/18/11. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
CLIFTON PERRY
9
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL MARTEL, as Acting Warden of )
California State Prison at San Quentin,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
_____________________________________ )
Case No. 1:11-cv-01367 AWI
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
REQUEST FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
15
On August 16, 2011, Petitioner Clifton Perry (“Perry”) a state prisoner facing capital punishment,
16
commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by filing an application for appointment of counsel and
17
request for a stay of execution. In Perry’s declaration, appended to this application, he includes a statement
18
of his indigence, a Certificate of Funds over the signature of a prison official, and a certified Inmate Statement
19
Report from the prison stating the amount on deposit in his prison account. A separate application for Perry
20
to proceed in forma pauperis also was filed on August 16, 2011 and corrected on August 17, 2011, over the
21
signature of Assistant Federal Defender Joseph Schlesinger. The forma pauperis application is supported by
22
Perry’s declaration appended to the request for stay and appointment of counsel.
23
I.
Request for Appointment of Counsel
24
Section 3599(a)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code provides for the appointment of one of more
25
attorneys to represent an indigent person proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to vacate a death sentence. Rule
26
191(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California also
27
provides for the appointment of counsel for indigent capital habeas petitioners. Under this rule, selection of
28
counsel is made from a panel of attorneys qualified for appointment in death penalty cases and certified by
11dp1367.1stOrd.Per.wpd
1
1
a selection board appointed by the Chief Judge. Based on the Perry’s submissions, he is entitled to
2
appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599(a)(2).
3
II.
Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
4
Rule 3(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provides that a
5
petitioner seeking in forma pauperis status shall file an affidavit of assets as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
6
Rule 3(a) also requires a certificate from the prison stating the amount on deposit in the petitioner’s accounts.
7
Perry’s declaration, Certificate of Funds over the signature of a prison official, and certified Inmate Statement
8
Report appended to his request for a stay of execution and appointment of counsel satisfy these requirements.
9
III.
Request for Stay of Execution
10
Local Rule 191(g)(1) provides that when an indigent, condemned habeas petitioner submits an
11
application for appointment of counsel and a temporary stay of execution, the Court may issue a temporary
12
stay of execution for a period of 90 days, while counsel is located. Perry has presented no facts or
13
circumstances to warrant the exercise of discretion to issue a temporary stay of execution in this case.
14
Good cause appearing therefor,
15
1.
Perry’s application for appointment of counsel is granted. The matter is referred to the
16
Selection Board for the Eastern District of California to certify an attorney or attorneys qualified and available
17
to represent Danks before this Court.
18
2.
Perry’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
19
3..
Perry’s application for a temporary stay of execution is denied without prejudice.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED
21
22
Dated:
August 18, 2011
/s/ Anthony W. Ishii
Anthony W. Ishii
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
11dp1367.1stOrd.Per.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?