Clifton Perry v. Acting Warden Michael Martel

Filing 5

ORDER Granting Application for Appointment of Counsel 1 and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 , 3 ; DENYING Without Prejudice Request for Stay of Execution 1 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/18/11. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CLIFTON PERRY 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL MARTEL, as Acting Warden of ) California State Prison at San Quentin, ) ) Respondent. ) ) _____________________________________ ) Case No. 1:11-cv-01367 AWI DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR STAY OF EXECUTION 15 On August 16, 2011, Petitioner Clifton Perry (“Perry”) a state prisoner facing capital punishment, 16 commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by filing an application for appointment of counsel and 17 request for a stay of execution. In Perry’s declaration, appended to this application, he includes a statement 18 of his indigence, a Certificate of Funds over the signature of a prison official, and a certified Inmate Statement 19 Report from the prison stating the amount on deposit in his prison account. A separate application for Perry 20 to proceed in forma pauperis also was filed on August 16, 2011 and corrected on August 17, 2011, over the 21 signature of Assistant Federal Defender Joseph Schlesinger. The forma pauperis application is supported by 22 Perry’s declaration appended to the request for stay and appointment of counsel. 23 I. Request for Appointment of Counsel 24 Section 3599(a)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code provides for the appointment of one of more 25 attorneys to represent an indigent person proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to vacate a death sentence. Rule 26 191(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California also 27 provides for the appointment of counsel for indigent capital habeas petitioners. Under this rule, selection of 28 counsel is made from a panel of attorneys qualified for appointment in death penalty cases and certified by 11dp1367.1stOrd.Per.wpd 1 1 a selection board appointed by the Chief Judge. Based on the Perry’s submissions, he is entitled to 2 appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599(a)(2). 3 II. Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 4 Rule 3(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provides that a 5 petitioner seeking in forma pauperis status shall file an affidavit of assets as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 6 Rule 3(a) also requires a certificate from the prison stating the amount on deposit in the petitioner’s accounts. 7 Perry’s declaration, Certificate of Funds over the signature of a prison official, and certified Inmate Statement 8 Report appended to his request for a stay of execution and appointment of counsel satisfy these requirements. 9 III. Request for Stay of Execution 10 Local Rule 191(g)(1) provides that when an indigent, condemned habeas petitioner submits an 11 application for appointment of counsel and a temporary stay of execution, the Court may issue a temporary 12 stay of execution for a period of 90 days, while counsel is located. Perry has presented no facts or 13 circumstances to warrant the exercise of discretion to issue a temporary stay of execution in this case. 14 Good cause appearing therefor, 15 1. Perry’s application for appointment of counsel is granted. The matter is referred to the 16 Selection Board for the Eastern District of California to certify an attorney or attorneys qualified and available 17 to represent Danks before this Court. 18 2. Perry’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 19 3.. Perry’s application for a temporary stay of execution is denied without prejudice. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED 21 22 Dated: August 18, 2011 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii Anthony W. Ishii United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 11dp1367.1stOrd.Per.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?