Robert Rodriguez v. Police Dog Kubo et al

Filing 11

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER, Motion to Dismiss Notice and Summary Judgment Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/03/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, 7 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 OFFICER TUSHNET, 11 12 Defendant. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01371 LJO DLB SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER, MOTION TO DISMISS NOTICE, AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE 14 Parties to this litigation shall take note of the following requirements: 15 1. Defendant must reply to the complaint within the time provided by the 16 applicable provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a). 17 2. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary 18 judgment, motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Rules 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59 19 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and motions pursuant to Local Rule 110 shall be 20 briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). 21 3. At some point in the litigation, defendant may file a motion to dismiss this 22 action on any number of grounds. Plaintiff is advised that he has the right to oppose the motion 23 in writing. Written oppositions must be served and filed not more than twenty-one days after the 24 date of service of the motion to dismiss. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a 25 motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” This 26 means that the court may deem plaintiff’s failure to oppose defendant’s motion to dismiss as a 27 waiver, and may recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. 28 1 1 4. At some point in the litigation, defendant may file a motion to dismiss for 2 failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to one or more claims in the complaint. The failure 3 to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to an unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss. 4 Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing Ritza v. Int’l Longshoremen’s & 5 Warehousemen’s Union, 837 F.2d 365, 368 (9th Cir. 1988) (per curium)). “In deciding a motion 6 to dismiss for failure to exhaust nonjudicial remedies, the court may look beyond the pleadings 7 and decide disputed issues of fact.” Wyatt, 837 F.3d at 1119-20 (quoting Ritza, 837 F.2d at 368). 8 If the district court concludes that the prisoner has not exhausted administrative remedies, the 9 case will be dismissed without prejudice. Wyatt, 837 F.3d at 1120. This means that the case will 10 end. If plaintiff exhausts administrative remedies at a later date, he may file the case as a new 11 action. 12 5. At some point in the litigation, one or more defendant may move for summary 13 judgment as to some or all of plaintiff’s claims. Pursuant to Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 14 409 (9th Cir. 1988) and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), plaintiff is advised of 15 the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment made by defendants 16 pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion is a request for an 17 order for judgment on some or all of plaintiff’s claims in favor of defendants without trial. See 18 Rule 56(a). Defendant’s motion will set forth the facts which defendant contends are not 19 reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle defendant to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 20 56(c). 21 Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the 22 motion, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set 23 forth in defendant(s)’ motion but argue that defendant(s) are not entitled to judgment as a matter 24 of law. Plaintiff may show defendant(s)’ facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: 25 (1) Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the 26 complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and if plaintiff calls 27 to the court's attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may 28 2 1 also serve and file affidavits or declarations1 setting forth the facts which plaintiff believes prove 2 plaintiff's claims (the persons who sign the affidavit or declaration must have personal 3 knowledge of the facts stated); (3) Plaintiff may also rely upon written records but plaintiff must 4 prove that the records are what plaintiff claims they are2; (4) Plaintiff may also rely upon all or 5 any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions 6 obtained in this proceeding. Should plaintiff fail to contradict defendants’ motion with 7 affidavits, declarations, or other evidence, defendants’ evidence will be taken as truth, and final 8 judgment may be entered without a full trial. See Rule 56(e). 9 If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when 10 required to oppose such a motion, the court will consider a request to postpone considering 11 defendant(s)’ motion. See Rule 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and file a request to postpone 12 consideration of defendant(s)’ motion or written opposition to the motion, the court may consider 13 plaintiff’s failure to act as a waiver of opposition to defendant(s)’ motion. Plaintiff’s waiver of 14 opposition to defendant(s)’ motion may result in the entry of summary judgment against plaintiff. 15 16 6. A motion supported by affidavits or declarations that are unsigned will be stricken. 17 7. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil 18 Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court, may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but 19 not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a October 3, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 1 24 25 26 27 28 An affidavit is a written declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, taken before an officer having authority to administer such oath. An unsworn declaration has the same effect as an affidavit, provided that it is dated and signed under penalty of perjury, as follows: “I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” 28 U.S.C. § 1746. Affidavits and declarations must be made on personal knowledge and must set forth facts as would be admissible in evidence. See Rule 56(e). 2 Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in an affidavit must be attached to the affidavit and served on the opposing party. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?