Cardoza v. Tann et al
Filing
133
ORDER DENYING 131 Motion signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/23/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE PEPE CARDOZA,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01386-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION AT
DOCKETS 131
vs.
M. TANN, et al.,
Defendants.
At Docket 131 Defendants F. Carreon, P. Paz, and R. Pinkham requested clarification
as to the Order Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97.1 The Court addressed the matter raised
in the motion in its Order Regarding Motions at Dockets 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, and 117.2
Accordingly, Defendants Paz, Carreon, and Pinkham’s Request for Clarification as to Order
Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97 is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of October, 2015.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Docket 129.
2
Docket 132.
ORDER RE DOCKET 31
Cardoza v. Tann, 1:11-cv-01386-RRB – 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?