Cardoza v. Tann et al

Filing 133

ORDER DENYING 131 Motion signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/23/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAWRENCE PEPE CARDOZA, Case No. 1:11-cv-01386-RRB Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION AT DOCKETS 131 vs. M. TANN, et al., Defendants. At Docket 131 Defendants F. Carreon, P. Paz, and R. Pinkham requested clarification as to the Order Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97.1 The Court addressed the matter raised in the motion in its Order Regarding Motions at Dockets 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, and 117.2 Accordingly, Defendants Paz, Carreon, and Pinkham’s Request for Clarification as to Order Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97 is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of October, 2015. S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Docket 129. 2 Docket 132. ORDER RE DOCKET 31 Cardoza v. Tann, 1:11-cv-01386-RRB – 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?