Cardoza v. Tann et al

Filing 48

ORDER Regarding 46 Motion for Clarification of Screening Order signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 07/18/2014. (Flores, E)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE PEPE CARDOZA,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01386-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING
MOTION AT DOCKET 46

vs.
M. TANN, et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 46 Plaintiff Lawrence Pepe Cardoza, appearing pro se, filed a Motion for
Clarification of Screening Order. Plaintiff’s motion requests clarification of the service
requirement.
Service of the Summons and Complaint by the Plaintiff is only required on
Defendants who have not previously been served and appeared. All Defendants, other
than the five for whom service was required, have appeared in this action and were served
with the Second Amended Complaint electronically by the Court. Accordingly, service of
the Summons and Complaint is only required on the five previously unserved Defendants
added in the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2014.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER RE MOTION AT DOCKET 46