Cardoza v. Tann et al

Filing 51

ORDER Dismissing Defendants T. Mackey, R. Pinkham, A. Wyckoff, T. Byers and M. Cortez signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 08/13/2014. (Flores, E)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE PEPE CARDOZA,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01386-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS
R. PINKHAM, T. MACKEY, T. BYERS,
A. WYCKOFF, and M. CORTEZ

vs.
M. TANN, et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 45 the Court entered its Screening Order Regarding Second Amended
Complaint. In that Order the Court directed service of the Second Amended Complaint on
certain Defendants who had not been previously served or appeared in this action, i.e.,
R. Pinkham, T. Mackey, T. Myers, A. Wyckoff, and M. Cortez. In that Screening Order the
Court warned Plaintiff that if he did not return the Notice of Submission of Documents and
the required documents by August 1, 2014, dismissal as to those Defendants would be
entered without further notice. Plaintiff has neither returned the Notice of Submission of
Documents and the required documents nor requested an extension of time within which
to comply with the Screening Order.
Accordingly, the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, as
to Defendants R. Pinkham, T. Mackey, T. Myers, A. Wyckoff, and M. Cortez.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2014.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS