Hill v. Clovis Police Department et al
Filing
30
ORDER VACATING December 19, 2011 Hearing, and ORDER on County Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/8/2011. (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
CLOVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
)
MARK BRADFORD (Badge #5465),
)
individually and as an officer of the
)
Clovis Police Department, OFFICE OF )
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRESNO )
COUNTY, ELIZABETH EGAN,
)
individually and as District Attorney, and )
ELANA ARON SMITH individually and )
as Deputy District Attorney,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
PRESTON HILL,
1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS
ORDER VACATING
DECEMBER 19, 2011
HEARING, AND ORDER ON
COUNTY DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
(Doc. No. 12)
19
20
Currently set for hearing and decision on December 19, 2011, is the County of Fresno
21
Defendants’ motion to dismiss. On November 18, 2011, the Court granted the City of Clovis’s
22
motion to dismiss. See Doc. No. 25. As part of that motion , the Court gave Plaintiff leave to
23
file an amended complaint against all Defendants. See id. On December 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed
24
an amended complaint.
25
An “amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non26
existent.” Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997); Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d
27
55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Here, the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, and the
28
1
original complaint is treated as non-existent. Since the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss
2
attacks Plaintiff’s original and now “non-existent” complaint, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
3
now moot.
4
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’s motion to dismiss is
DENIED as moot and the December 19, 2011, hearing is VACATED.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
0m8i78
December 8, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?