Hill v. Clovis Police Department et al

Filing 30

ORDER VACATING December 19, 2011 Hearing, and ORDER on County Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/8/2011. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CLOVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) MARK BRADFORD (Badge #5465), ) individually and as an officer of the ) Clovis Police Department, OFFICE OF ) THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRESNO ) COUNTY, ELIZABETH EGAN, ) individually and as District Attorney, and ) ELANA ARON SMITH individually and ) as Deputy District Attorney, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) PRESTON HILL, 1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 19, 2011 HEARING, AND ORDER ON COUNTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 12) 19 20 Currently set for hearing and decision on December 19, 2011, is the County of Fresno 21 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. On November 18, 2011, the Court granted the City of Clovis’s 22 motion to dismiss. See Doc. No. 25. As part of that motion , the Court gave Plaintiff leave to 23 file an amended complaint against all Defendants. See id. On December 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed 24 an amended complaint. 25 An “amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non26 existent.” Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997); Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 27 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Here, the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, and the 28 1 original complaint is treated as non-existent. Since the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss 2 attacks Plaintiff’s original and now “non-existent” complaint, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is 3 now moot. 4 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot and the December 19, 2011, hearing is VACATED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: 0m8i78 December 8, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?