Chevron Environmental Management Company et al v. BKK Corporation et al
Filing
184
ORDER Granting Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice for All Claims Against Defendant L.W. Potter, Inc., signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/4/13. (Gonzalez, R)
Daniel E. Vineyard
California Bar No. 121132
Texas Bar No. 00792046
Courtney T. Carlson
Texas Bar No. 24065004
Federal ID No. 1115579
1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77010
Telephone: 713-752-4277
Facsimile: 713-308-4177
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMPANY and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Case No.: 1:11-cv-01396-LJOCOMPANY, a California corporation, and CHEVRON BAM
U.S.A. INC., a Pennsylvania corporation,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ENERGY PRODUCTION & SALES CO., GOLDEN
GATE PETROLEUM CO., KERN FRONT SEC.-35
PARTNERS,
L.
W.
POTTER,
INC.,
M.P.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., AND M P
VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE.
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE FOR ALL
CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANT L. W.
POTTER, INC.
Defendants
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE FOR ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT L. W. POTTER, INC.
It is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPANY and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.’s Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice For All
Claims Against Defendant L. W. POTTER, INC. in this action is GRANTED. Only Defendant
L. W. POTTER, INC. is dismissed from this lawsuit. This dismissal is with prejudice.
Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice For All Claims Against L. W. Potter, Inc. –
Page 1
The clerk is directed not to close this action
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
December 4, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice For All Claims Against L. W. Potter, Inc. –
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?