Chevron Environmental Management Company et al v. BKK Corporation et al
Filing
87
ORDER Granting Dismissal without Prejudice for all Claims Against Defendant Consolidated Fiberglass Products Company signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/15/2012. (Flores, E)
Daniel E. Vineyard
California Bar No. 121132
Texas Bar No. 00792046
Courtney T. Carlson
Texas Bar No. 24065004
Federal ID No. 1115579
1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77010
Telephone: 713-752-4277
Facsimile: 713-308-4177
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMPANY and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Case No.: 1:11-cv-01396-LJOBAM
COMPANY, a California corporation, and
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., a Pennsylvania corporation,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BKK CORPORATION, et. al.
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING
DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR ALL
CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANT
CONSOLIDATED FIBER
GLASS PRODUCTS
COMPANY
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ALL
CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT CONSOLIDATED FIBER GLASS PRODUCTS
COMPANY
It is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPANY and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.’s Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice For All
Claims Against Defendant CONSOLIDATED FIBER GLASS PRODUCTS COMPANY in this
action is GRANTED. Only Defendant CONSOLIDATED FIBER GLASS PRODUCTS
COMPANY is dismissed by this order.
Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice For All Claims Against Defendant Consolidated
Fiber Glass Products Company – Page 1
This dismissal is without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 15, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
66h44d
Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice For All Claims Against Defendant Consolidated
Fiber Glass Products Company – Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?