Hissong v. Tulare County, et al.
Filing
10
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Document # 5 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/9/2011. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY EARL HISSONG, Sr.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
TULARE COUNTY, et al.,
15
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
vs.
14
1:11-cv-01397-SKO (PC)
Defendants.
________________________________/
(Document #5)
16
Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in this action.
17
Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009); Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353
18
(9th Cir. 1981). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1915(e)(1), but it will do so only if exceptional circumstances exist. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970;
20
Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1981). In making this determination, the
21
Court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of Plaintiff to
22
articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer, 560
23
F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation marks omitted); Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. Neither
24
consideration is dispositive and they must be viewed together. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citation
25
and quotation marks omitted); Wilborn 789 F.2d at 1331.
26
In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even
27
if it is assumed that Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made serious
28
-1-
1
allegations which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. The Court is
2
faced with similar cases almost daily. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of
3
counsel is HEREBY DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
i0d3h8
September 9, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?