Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al

Filing 49

ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Close Action Pursuant to Plaintiff's 48 Motion to Dismiss Action signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 08/20/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRUCE KOKLICH, Case No. 1:11-cv-01403- DLB PC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE ACTION PURUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS ACTION (ECF No. 48) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Bruce Koklich (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department 18 19 of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil action 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants CDCR, James A. Yates, 21 P. Mendoza, McCoy, J. Ward, A. Walker, J. Babcock, Igbinosa, G. Kalisher, and J. Clark Kelso. On 22 August 15, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting dismissal of this action without prejudice. ECF 23 No. 48. The plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order when the notice is submitted before 24 25 the opposing party has served an answer or motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 41(a)(1)(A)(i). No answer or motion for summary judgment has been served by Defendants. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of 3 dismissal; and 4 2. All other pending motions are denied as moot. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: /s/ Dennis August 20, 2012 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 3b142a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?