Chappell v. Stankorb, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Denying Plaintiff's Motions For Preliminary Injunction (Docs. 6 , 9 , 10 , 13 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/9/2012. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
REX CHAPPELL,

CASE NO: 1:11-cv-01425-LJO-GBC (PC)

10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION

T. STANKORB, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14

/ Docs. 6, 9, 10, 13

15
16

On August 25, 2011, Plaintiff Rex Chappell (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se

17

and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

18

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

19

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On December 9, 2011, January 9, 2012, and March 12, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for a

21

Temporary Restraining Order, a Notice of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and a Motion

22

for Preliminary Injunction to direct prison officials to make Plaintiff single cell status. Docs. 6, 9,

23

10. On April 23, 2012, the Magistrate Judge construed these as motions for a preliminary injunction

24

and issued Findings and Recommendations to deny the motions. Doc. 13. On May 18, 2012, the

25

Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file objections. Doc. 16.

26

Plaintiff has not filed any objections.

27

//

28

//
Page 1 of 2

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

2

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

3

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

6

The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 23, 2012, are ADOPTED, in full;
and

7

2.

8

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction, filed December 9, 2011, January 9,
2012, and March 12, 2012, are DENIED.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

Dated:
b9ed48

July 9, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2