Haltom v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/2/13. New Case Number is: 2:13-cv-00227-KJN. The old Case Number 1:11-cv-01439-LJO-SMS. (Gonzalez, R)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MICHAEL HALTOM,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01439-LJO-SMS
5
Plaintiff,
6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION
OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
v.
7
8
MICHAEL ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
9
10
Defendant.
_____________________________/
11
12
On September 28, 2011, Plaintiff Michael Haltom filed a complaint seeking review of the
13
Commissioner's decision to deny his application for Social Security disability benefits. On the date
14
of filing, Plaintiff resided in Thornton, San Joaquin County, California. Doc. 18-1. Plaintiff 's
15
residence has not changed since the filing date. Id.
16
Federal law is clear on the issue of venue: the plaintiff must file suit in the judicial district in
17
which he or she resides or a has a principal place of business. 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). If the plaintiff
18
files in the wrong district, the Court may transfer venue to the proper district. Id. In this case,
19
although Plaintiff properly filed his complaint in the Eastern District of California, she improperly
20
filed it in the Fresno Division rather than the Sacramento Division where it was properly venued.
21
Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS this case TRANSFERRED to the Sacramento
22
Division of the Eastern District of California.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
icido3
February 2, 2013
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?