(PC) Dubrin et al v. Bonilla

Filing 105

ORDER to PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/3/2016. Show Cause Response due within 5 days. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DUBRIN et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
MICHAEL STAINER, et al.,
Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01484 DAD JLT
ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
THE COURT’S ORDER

16
17

On February 16, 2016, the Court ordered counsel for plaintiffs, Mark Ravis, to provide it the

18

last known address for those plaintiffs with whom he had no recent contact. (Doc. 100 at 3) He

19

provided the names but not the addresses. (Doc. 104) Thus, the Court ordered Mr. Ravis to provide

20

the addresses by February 26, 2016. Id. Once again, he did not comply.

21

Therefore, the Court ORDERS Mark Ravis to show cause in writing within five days why

22

sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, he

23

may provide the addresses as ordered on February 16, 2016. (Doc. 100 at 3).

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 3, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE