(PC) Dubrin et al v. Bonilla

Filing 62

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed and Why the Discovery Stay Should Not Be Lifted for Failure to Comply With the Court's Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/4/2015. Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 1:11-cv-01484-AWI-JLT (PC) DURBIN, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 BONILLA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AND WHY THE DISCOVERY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER On February 4, 2015, the Court granted counsel’s stipulation to stay discovery and granted 17 time to advise the Court whether the parties wanted a settlement conference. (Doc. 61) At that 18 time, counsel reported they were in settlement negotiations and would notify the Court by the 19 end of February whether they desired a settlement conference. (Doc. 60) They have not done so. 20 Therefore, within 14 days, the Court ORDERS counsel for both sides to show cause why 21 sanctions, up to and including an order dismissing the action or an order striking the answer and 22 entering default, should not be imposed and why the discovery stay should not be lifted due to 23 their failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, the parties may provide the 24 information previously ordered within the same 14-day period. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: March 4, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?