(PC) Dubrin et al v. Bonilla
Filing
62
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed and Why the Discovery Stay Should Not Be Lifted for Failure to Comply With the Court's Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/4/2015. Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
1:11-cv-01484-AWI-JLT (PC)
DURBIN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14
BONILLA, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AND WHY THE
DISCOVERY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT'S ORDER
On February 4, 2015, the Court granted counsel’s stipulation to stay discovery and granted
17
time to advise the Court whether the parties wanted a settlement conference. (Doc. 61) At that
18
time, counsel reported they were in settlement negotiations and would notify the Court by the
19
end of February whether they desired a settlement conference. (Doc. 60) They have not done so.
20
Therefore, within 14 days, the Court ORDERS counsel for both sides to show cause why
21
sanctions, up to and including an order dismissing the action or an order striking the answer and
22
entering default, should not be imposed and why the discovery stay should not be lifted due to
23
their failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, the parties may provide the
24
information previously ordered within the same 14-day period.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated:
March 4, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?