(PC) Dubrin et al v. Bonilla
Filing
9
ORDER finding service of complaint appropriate and directing Clerk of Court to issue summons signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/28/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DUBRIN, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
BONILLA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11-cv-01484 JLT (PC)
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF THE
COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE
(Doc. 7)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO ISSUE SUMMONS
16
17
18
Plaintiffs are state prisoners who are represented by counsel. The Court has screened Plaintiffs’
19
First Amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and has found that it states a cognizable Eighth
20
Amendment claim against the Defendants. If the allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint incident are proven,
21
Plaintiffs have a reasonable opportunity of prevailing on the merits of the claims.
22
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
24
Service of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is appropriate as to all named
Defendants;
25
2.
26
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue a summons in this case to Defendants
Bounville, Matthew Cate and Michael Stainer.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3.
Once the summons is received, Plaintiffs SHALL immediately initiate service pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: October 28, 2011
9j7khi
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?