Brooks v. Tate

Filing 101

ORDER CLOSING CASE in Light of Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 100 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/8/16: The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RODNEY BROOKS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. TATE, No. 1:11-cv-01503 AWI DLB ORDER CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Document 100) Defendant. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff Rodney Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action settled on May 13, 2015, and settlement funds were paid to Plaintiff on February 26, 2016. On March 4, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of this action with 18 prejudice. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulated dismissal, this case automatically terminated on 19 March 4. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). 20 21 Accordingly, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, the Clerk shall CLOSE this case. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2016 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?