Brooks v. Tate
Filing
101
ORDER CLOSING CASE in Light of Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 100 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/8/16: The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RODNEY BROOKS,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
v.
TATE,
No. 1:11-cv-01503 AWI DLB
ORDER CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
(Document 100)
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff Rodney Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983.
This action settled on May 13, 2015, and settlement funds were paid to Plaintiff on
February 26, 2016.
On March 4, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of this action with
18
prejudice. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulated dismissal, this case automatically terminated on
19
March 4. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
20
21
Accordingly, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, the Clerk
shall CLOSE this case.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 8, 2016
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?