Honnevk et al v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company

Filing 34

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue scheduling conference date, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 06/13/2013. Scheduling Conference currently set for 6/25/2013 has been CONTINUED to 8/27/2013 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 William D. Naeve (SBN 92270) MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP 2 200 West Santa Ana Boulevard, Suite 801 Santa Ana, California 92701-4134 3 Telephone: (714) 972-9977 Facsimile: (714) 972-1404 4 wnaeve@murchisonlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 Timothy L. Marks TIMOTHY L. MARKS & ASSOCIATES 8 4753 East Olive Avenue, Suite 103 Fresno, CA 93702 9 Telephone: (559) 251-5324 Facsimile: (559)251-5483 10 timothymarks@sbcglobal.net 11 Attorney Plaintiffs, FRISCO HONNEVK and BOUALAI VONGPHACHANH 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 15 16 FRISCO HONNEVK, BOUALAI CASE NO. 1:11 CV 01531 AWI DLB Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE 17 VONGPHACHANH, 18 19 vs. 20 FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL 27 PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 28 1 1 It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiffs, FRISCO HONNEVK and 2 BOUALAI VONGPHACHANH, and defendant, FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE 3 INSURANCE COMPANY ("FNWL"), and each of them, by and through their 4 respective attorneys of record that the June 25, 2013 Scheduling Conference be 5 continued to a date established by this Court. 6 This Stipulation is predicated on good cause and not presented for purposes of 7 delay and is based on the following facts. 8 1. By this Court's April 26, 2013 Minute Order, the previously set Pretrial 9 Conference date of May 3, 2013, and the June 11, 2013 trial date were vacated in light 10 of the fact that the Court has not yet issued a ruling on defendant FNWL's pending 11 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication. Instead, the Court set 12 this case for a Scheduling Conference to occur on June 25, 2013. 13 2. The Court has not yet assigned a new trial date to this action. 14 3. The Court has not yet issued a ruling on FNWL's pending Motion for 15 Summary Judgment. Accordingly, counsel for plaintiffs and defendant have met and 16 conferred, and agreed to submit this Stipulation to the Court requesting that the 17 June 25, 2013 Scheduling Conference be continued until the Court has ruled on the 18 pending Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties decided to submit this request 19 since they do not know how they would prepare for or know what issues need to be 20 addressed at the Scheduling Conference until a ruling has been issued on the pending 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. 22 4. Predicated on these facts, the parties respectfully request this Court to 23 continue the June 25, 2013 Scheduling Conference until after a ruling has been issued 24 on defendant FNWL's pending Motion for Summary Judgment. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 2 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: June 12, 2013 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP 4 5 6 7 By: /s/ William D. Naeve Attorneys for Defendant, FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 8 9 10 DATED: June 12, 2013 TIMOTHY I. MARKS & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Timothy I. Marks Attorneys for Plaintiffs FRISCO HONNEVK and BOUALAI VONGPHACHANH 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 ORDER 2 3 4 Based upon the foregoing and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS SO ORDERED: 5 6 The existing Scheduling Conference date of June 25, 2013, shall be continued to 7 August 27, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. and the filing deadlines for documents required to be 8 filed in advance of this Scheduling Conference shall be continued pursuant to Federal 9 10 Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 281 and 281. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: June 13, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?