Lopez, et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.
Filing
39
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/21/2012. (Initial Disclosure Deadline: 2/27/2012, Expert Disclosure due 9/28/2012, Supplemental Expert Disclosure due 10/12/2012, Non-expert Discovery Cutoff: 9/28/2 012, Expert Discovery Cutoff: 12/15/2012, Pretrial Motion Filing Deadline: 2/15/2013, Pretrial Motion Hearing Deadline: 3/15/2013, Settlement Conference set for 8/29/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin, Pr etrial Conference set for 4/3/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, & Jury Trial (10 Days Est) set for 5/13/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.)(Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARIO LOPEZ, et. al.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 11-001547- BAM
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER
Initial Disclosure:
February 27, 2012
Expert Disclosure:
September 28, 2012
Supplemental
Expert Disclosure:
October 12, 2012
Non-expert
Discovery Cutoff:
September 28, 2012
Expert
Discovery Cutoff:
December 15, 2012
16
Pretrial Motion
Filing Deadline:
February 15, 2013
17
Pretrial Motion
Hearing Deadline:
March 15, 2013
10
v.
11
12
COUNTY OF TULARE,
et. al.,
13
14
Defendants.
_____________________________
15
18
Settlement Conf.:
Date: August 29, 2012
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Dept: 10(GSA)
Pretrial Conf.:
Date: April 3, 2013
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: 8(BAM)
Jury Trial:
(10 days est.)
**Date: May 13, 2013
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 8(BAM)
19
20
21
22
23
24
This1 Court conducted a scheduling conference on February 13, 2012. Counsel Michael
25
26
27
28
**
Counsel should note that the trial date has changed to May 13, 2013.
1
1
Haddad appeared by telephone on behalf of Plaintiffs. Counsel Dennis Thelen and Teresa Saucedo
2
appeared by telephone on behalf of Defendants. Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b), this Court sets a
3
schedule for this action.
4
1.
5
6
Amendment To The Parties’ Pleadings
Proposed amendments will be forwarded to the opposing party no later than August 1, 2012.
2.
Consent To Magistrate Judge
7
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to conduct all further proceedings
8
in this case, including trial, before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe, United States Magistrate
9
Judge.
10
3.
11
12
F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures
Initial disclosures shall be completed on or before February 27, 2012.
4.
Discovery Cutoffs And Limits
13
Initial expert witness disclosures by any party shall be served no later than September 28,
14
2012. Supplemental expert witness disclosures by any party shall be served no later than October
15
12, 2012. Such disclosures must be made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) and shall
16
include all information required thereunder. In addition, F.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) and F.R.Civ.P. 26(e)
17
shall specifically apply to all discovery relating to expert witnesses and their opinions. Each expert
18
witness must be prepared fully to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the
19
designations. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in the imposition of appropriate
20
sanctions, which may include the preclusion of testimony or other evidence offered through the
21
expert witness. In particular, this Court will enforce preclusion of testimony or other evidence if
22
F.R.Civ.P. 26(e) is not strictly complied with. All non-expert discovery, including motions to
23
compel, shall be completed no later than September 28, 2012. All expert discovery, including
24
motions to compel, shall be completed no later than December 15, 2012.
25
5.
26
Pretrial Motion Schedule
All pre-trial motions, both dispositive and non-dispositive (except motions to compel,
27
28
2
1
addressed above), shall be served and filed on or before February 15, 2013. Such motions shall be
2
set before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe not later than March 15, 2013.
3
Motions are heard on Fridays at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe,
4
United States Magistrate Judge, in Courtroom 8. Before scheduling such motions, the parties shall
5
comply with Local Rule 230 or Local Rule 251. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 with
6
respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped from
7
calendar. In addition to filing a joint statement electronically, a copy of the joint statement shall also
8
be sent Judge McAuliffe’s chambers by email to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
9
The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained, all moving and
10
opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases before Judge McAuliffe shall not exceed
11
twenty-five (25) pages. Reply briefs by the moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These
12
page limitations do not include exhibits. Briefs that exceed this page limitation, or are sought to be
13
filed without leave, may not be considered by the Court.
14
Counsel or pro se parties may appear and argue motions by telephone, providing a written
15
request to do so is made to Judge McAuliffe’s Clerk no later than five (5) court days before the
16
noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one party requests to appear by telephone, it shall
17
be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call to the Court.
18
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
19
Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication the
20
parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be
21
raised in the motion.
22
The purpose of meeting shall be to : 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where
23
a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in
24
whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4)
25
narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties
26
incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a joint statement of
27
28
3
1
undisputed facts.
2
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the joint statement of
3
undisputed facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a
4
joint statement of undisputed facts.
5
In the notice of motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred
6
as ordered above and set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
7
6.
Mandatory Settlement Conference
8
A Settlement Conference will be held on August 29, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10
9
before Magistrate Judge Gary Austin. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the
10
attorneys who will try the case shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the
11
person or persons having full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms, at the
12
conference.
13
No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit
14
directly to Judge Austin’s chambers at gsaorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement
15
conference statement. This statement should neither be filed with the clerk of the Court nor served
16
on any other party. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and
17
time of the mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. Counsel are urged to request
18
the return of their statements. If such request is not made, the Court will dispose of the statement.
19
The confidential settlement conference statement shall include the following:
20
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case;
21
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses (i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
22
which the claims or defenses are based), a forthright evaluation of the parties’
23
likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses, and a description of the major
24
issues in dispute;
25
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date;
26
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further pretrial and trial matters,
27
28
including discovery;
4
1
E.
The relief sought; and
2
F.
The party’s position on settlement, including the amount which the party will
3
accept to settle, realistic settlement expectations, present demands and offers,
4
and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
5
This Court will vacate the settlement conference if the Court finds the settlement conference
6
will be neither productive nor meaningful to attempt to resolve all or part of this case. As far in
7
advance of the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and other parties that
8
it believes the case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or reset the settlement
9
conference. Otherwise the parties shall proceed with the settlement conference in good faith to
10
attempt to resolve all or part of the case.
11
7.
Pretrial Conference
12
This Court sets a pretrial conference for April 3, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 and will
13
be heard before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties are directed to file a joint
14
pretrial statement which complies with the requirements of this Court’s Local Rule 281. In addition,
15
the joint pretrial statement should include a brief factual summary and an agreed upon neutral
16
statement of the case. An additional copy of the joint pretrial statement, carefully prepared and
17
executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF and shall be e-mailed in
18
WordPerfect format to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
The parties’ attention is directed to this Court’s Local Rules 281 and 282. This Court will
19
20
insist upon strict compliance with those rules.
At the pretrial conference, the Court will set deadlines, among others, to file motions in
21
22
limine, final witness lists, exhibits, jury instructions, objections, and other trial documents.
23
8.
Trial Date
A ten-day jury trial is set for May 13, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 before Magistrate
24
25
Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.
26
9.
27
28
Effect Of This Order
This order represents the best estimate of the Court and parties as to the agenda most suitable
5
1
to dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order
2
cannot be met, the parties are ordered to notify the Court immediately of that fact so that adjustments
3
may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. Stipulations extending the
4
deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or
5
declarations with attached exhibits, where appropriate, which establish good cause for granting the
6
relief requested.
7
8
9
Failure to comply with this order shall result in the imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
February 21, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?