Puckett v. Corcoran Prison - CDCR, et al.
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/22/2011 denying 7 Notice and request for screening of complaint and granting extension of time to file responsive pleading. (Filing Deadline: 10/25/2011). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT,
Plaintiff,
10
11
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01565-LJO-GBC (PC)
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR COURT
TO SCREEN PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
v.
(ECF No. 7)
12
CORCORAN PRISON, et al.,
Defendants.
13
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE
/ PLEADING
14
ORDER
15
16
Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in
17
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff originally filed the action in
18
Kings County Superior Court as case No. 11C0238 on June 14, 2011. (ECF No. 1.)
19
Defendants removed this action on September 13, 2011. (Id.) On September 20, 2011,
20
Defendants filed a request seeking to have the complaint screened and to be allowed thirty
21
days from the date of the screening order to respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 7.)
22
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief
23
against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
24
§ 1915A(a). The Court screens complaints in the order in which they are filed and strives
25
to avoid delays whenever possible. However, there are hundreds of prisoner civil rights
26
cases presently pending before the court, and delays are inevitable despite the Court’s
27
best efforts. Thus, Defendants’ request to have the complaint screened immediately is
28
DENIED.
1
The Court will grant Defendants’ request that they be relieved from the obligation
1
2
to file a responsive pleading until thirty days after the complaint is screened.
3
Defendants’ request is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants shall have
4
thirty (30) days to file a response to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the
5
screening order.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
1j0bbc
September 22, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?