Earl v. Fresno Unified School District

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/6/2011. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
RUBY J. EARL,
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, )
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )

1:11-cv-01568 LJO GSA
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Document 5)

16
17

On October 31, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations

18

recommending that certain causes of action be dismissed from this action. The Findings and

19

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be

20

filed within thirty days (30) days. Plaintiff has not filed objections.

21

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28 of the United States Code section 636

22

(b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the

23

entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record

24

and proper analysis.

25

//

26

//

27
28

1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3

The Findings and Recommendations dated October 31, 2011, are ADOPTED IN
FULL;

4

2.

The claims against Defendant Fresno Unified School District pertaining to

5

sections 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1986 of Title 42 of the United States Code are

6

dismissed with prejudice; and

7

3.

8

The claim against Defendant Fresno Unified School District pertaining to the
California Education Code is dismissed with prejudice.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

Dated:
66h44d

December 6, 2011

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2