Brown v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 09/28/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ANTHONY BROWN, 1:11-cv-01585-DLB-(HC) 12 13 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Petitioner, 14 vs. 15 U.S.A., 16 Respondent. 17 / 18 19 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 21 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 22 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside 23 in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise 24 to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or 25 (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may 26 otherwise be brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 27 In this case, the petitioner is challenging a conviction from Washington D.C. Superior Court, 28 which is in the District of Columbia. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United States -1- 1 District Court for the District of Columbia. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a case 2 filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 3 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). 4 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ah0l4d September 28, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?