Frontier Contracting, Inc. et al v. Allen Engineering Contractor, Inc. et al
Filing
131
Order To Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed For Failure To Obey Order Upon Settlement. (ECF No. 128) Fourteen Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on May 12, 2015. (Yu, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
FRONTIER CONTRACTING, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
v.
ALLEN ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR,
INC., et al.,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01590-MJS
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER UPON
SETTLEMENT
(ECF No. 128.)
17
Defendants.
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
18
19
20
Plaintiffs filed this action on September 20, 2011. On March 4, 2015, a settlement
21
conference was held before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Settlement was reached,
22
terms and conditions of settlement were placed on the record, and pending dates were
23
vacated. (ECF Nos. 127 & 128.) The parties were ordered to file dispositional documents
24
within sixty (60) days. (ECF No. 128.) The deadline to file the documents has passed
25
without such documents, or a request for an extension of time, being filed.
26
A failure to file dispositional documents on the date prescribed by the Court may be
27
grounds for sanctions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, 16; Local Rules 110, 160. Here, the parties
28
have not responded to the Court ordered deadline for filing dispositional documents.
1
1
2
3
4
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Within fourteen (14) days of service of this Order, counsel for the parties shall show
cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file dispositional
documents upon settlement by the date prescribed by the Court.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
May 12, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?