Yursik v. Inland Crop Dusters Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL with Prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/19/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3

D. MITCHELL TAYLOR (SBN 109444)
LAW OFFICES OF D. MITCHELL TAYLOR
599 E Serena Street
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5

Attorney for Plaintiff,
Steve Yursik

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10

STEVE YURSIK

11
12

Plaintiff,
vs.

13
14
15

INLAND CROP DUSTERS INC,
JAY WILSON, an individual, and NOEL
WILSON, an individual, and Does
1 through 20, inclusive.

16

Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO: 1:11-cv-01602-LJO-JLT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; ORDER

17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, between plaintiff, Steve Yursik and defendants, Inland Crop
19
Dusters Inc., Jay Wilson and Noel Wilson, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the
20
Court may make and enter its Order dismissing this action in its entirety with prejudice.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL W ITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
-1Yursik vs Inland Crops Dusters, et al

1
2

DATED: December 13, 2012

LAW OFFICES OF D. MITCHELL TAYLOR

3
4
By: /s/D. Mitchell Taylor
D. Mitchell Taylor ,Attorney for Plaintiff,
Gregory Willems

5
6
7
Dated: December 13, 2012

FORD, WALKER, HAGGERTY & BEHAR

8
9
10

By: /s/Tina I. Mangarpan for
Jeffrey S. Behar for Defendants, Inland Crop
Dusters, Inc., et al

11
12
13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the case is dismissed, and the Clerk of the Court is
14
directed to term this case in its entirety.
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19

Dated:
b9ed48

December 19, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL W ITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
-2Yursik vs Inland Crops Dusters, et al