Green v. Chakotos et al

Filing 60

ORDER denying as moot 53 Motion to strike third amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/11/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRA GREEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 1:11-cv-01611 LJO DLB PC v. JOHN CHAKOTOS, 15 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. 53] Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Ira Green (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 19 Second Amended Complaint, filed on May 3, 2013, against Defendant Chakotos for a claim of 20 deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendant filed an answer to the SAC 21 on August 25, 2014, and the Court issued a scheduling order on August 26, 2014. On October 2, 2014, Plaintiff lodged a Third Amended Complaint. Defendant moved to 22 23 strike the Third Amended Complaint on October 10, 2014, and Plaintiff filed an opposition on 24 October 29, 2014. However, on October 15, 2014, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to return 25 the lodged complaint to Plaintiff. Therefore, Defendant’s motion is now moot. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to strike the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis November 11, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?