Lanier v. Clovis Unified School District
Filing
24
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/21/2012 vacating hearing and terminating 12 , 13 Motions to Dismiss. (Defendants Response due by 4/5/2012).(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
JAMES M. LANIER,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01613-LJO-GSA
13
Plaintiff,
14
ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND TO
TERM MOTION (Docs. 12, 13)
vs.
15
CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
16
Defendant.
17
/
18
19
On February 24, 2012, defendant Clovis Unified School District filed their Fed. R. Civ. P.
20
12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s original complaint and set a March 29, 2012 hearing. On March
21
16, 2012, plaintiff filed his first amended complaint as a matter of course under Fed. R. Civ. P.
22
15(a)(1)(B). As such, this Court:
23
1.
24
25
the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the original complaint;
2.
26
27
28
VACATES the March 29, 2012 hearing in that the first amended complaint renders moot
DIRECTS the clerk to term the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the original
complaint (Docs. 12, 13); and
3.
ORDERS the moving defendants, no later than April 5, 2012, to file papers to respond
to the first amended complaint.
1
1
This Court will take no further action on the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the original
2
complaint (Docs. 12, 13).
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
March 21, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?