Cotton v. Young et al
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 23 Request to Submit Redacted Exhibit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING Request to Seal Exhibit B Attached to Motion for Summary Judgment Filed February 6, 2014 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/19/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DUANE COTTON,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. PAIK YOUNG,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11-cv-01634-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST
TO SUBMIT REDACTED EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
GRANTING REQUEST TO SEAL EXHIBIT B
ATTACHED TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT FILED FEBRUARY 6, 2014
[ECF Nos. 22, 23]
Plaintiff Duane Cotton is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s request to seal Exhibit B initially submitted on
20
February 6, 2014, in support of the motion for summary judgment, and request for permission to file a
21
redacted version of Exhibit B.
22
Good cause having been shown,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
The initially submitted Exhibit B to the Declaration of Kendall Wagner, M.D. in
25
support of the motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment or
26
summary adjudication by Defendant Young Paik, M.D. is SEALED; and
27
28
2.
Within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant is allowed to
submit a redacted copy of Exhibit B to the Declaration of Kendall Wagner, M.D. in support of the
1
1
motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment or summary
2
adjudication by Defendant Young Paik, M.D. that complies with the redaction requirements set forth
3
in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 19, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?