Perez-Falcon v. Synagro West LLC

Filing 25

ORDER re Stipulation re Protective Order 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/27/2012. (Hall, S)

6

Vince M. Verde CA Bar No. 202472
[e-mail]
Angela Pak CA Bar No. 240177
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Park Tower, Suite 1500
695 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 714.754.1298

7

Attorneys for Defendant SYNAGRO WEST, LLC

1
2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MIMI PEREZ-FALCON,

12
13

Case No. 1:11-CV-01645-AWI-JLT
ORDER RE STIPULATION RE
PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.

(Doc. 24)

14

SYNAGRO WEST, LLC; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19

Before the Court is the stipulation of the parties for a protective order related

20

to confidential information. The stipulation was filed by the parties on November

21

27, 2012 as docket entry 24.

22
23

occur before any motion is filed with the Court related to the designation of the

24

disputed document. (Doc. 24 at 6-7) Assuming this process is not successful in

25

bringing about agreement, the parties agree the complaining party may file a motion

26

for the Court to determine the dispute. Id. at 8. However, the parties fail to

27

incorporate the Court’s requirement, set forth in the scheduling order, for the parties

28
11cv1645.o.grnt.sti
p protective
order.Perez
Falcon.AWI.JLT.do
c

The Court notes that the stipulation requires a meet and confer process to

to have a telephonic hearing with the Court before any discovery dispute is filed.
1
Case No. 11cv01645 AWI-JLT
ORDER RE STIPULATION RE PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

(Doc. 17 at 3-4) The Court concludes that a dispute related to this protective order

2

falls within the procedures set forth in the scheduling order. Id. Thus, the Court will

3

modify the stipulation to require compliance with the scheduling order in addition to

4

any requirements set forth in the stipulation regarding disputes related to the

5

confidentiality of documents.
ORDER

6
7

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

8

that the provisions of the concurrently filed stipulation between the parties regarding

9

the use and protection of Confidential Information (Doc. 24) shall be entered as the

10

Order of the Court and be binding upon the parties with the following modification:

11

Before any attempt to obtain “Judicial Intervention” as set forth in paragraph

12

6.3, the parties SHALL comply with paragraph V of the scheduling order (Doc. 17

13

at 3-4).

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 27, 2012

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

17
18

9j7khijed

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11cv1645.o.grnt.sti
p protective
order.Perez
Falcon.AWI.JLT.do
c

2
Case No. 11cv01645 AWI-JLT
ORDER RE STIPULATION RE PROTECTIVE ORDER