Smith v. Pina et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/0/32012. Sumaya, Estrada and Munoz terminated from Action. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. S. PINA, et al., 11 1:11-cv-1651-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 18) Defendants. 12 13 _______________________________/ 14 15 Plaintiff Robert Lewis Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On May 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, 19 recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff 20 has not filed any objections. 21 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this 22 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 23 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 24 analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1- 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 24, 2012, are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his failure to protect claim against Defendant 5 Pina; 6 3. 7 Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Munoz, Sumaya, and Estrada be dismissed with prejudice; and 8 4. Defendants Munoz, Sumaya, and Estrada be dismissed from this action. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 66h44d July 3, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?