Smith v. Pina et al
Filing
35
ORDER adopting 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 29 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/30/2013. ( Filing Deadline set for 11/4/2013 for Pina to file a response to First Amended Complaint). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
ROBERT LEWIS SMITH,
13
Case No. 1:11-cv-01651-LJO-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANT PINA’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
S. PINA, et al.,
ECF Nos. 29, 32
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff Robert Lewis Smith (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner, filed this civil
19
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 29, 2011. The matter was referred to a
20
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations,
22
recommending that Defendant Pina’s motion to dismiss be denied. (ECF No. 32.) Defendant
23
Pina has filed objections. (ECF No. 33.)
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 304, this
2 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
3 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
4 analysis.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 16, 2013, are adopted in full;
7
2.
Defendant Pina’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 29) is DENIED; and
8
3.
Defendant Pina should file a response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint
within thirty days of entry of this order.
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 30, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?