Smith v. Pina et al
Filing
47
ORDER & WRIT Of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/20/2014. (Fahrney, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT LEWIS SMITH,
1:11-CV-01651-LJO-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
S. PINA, et al.,
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AD TESTIFICANDUM
Defendants.
/
Robert Smith, CDCR # H-66507, a necessary and material witness in a settlement conference in
this case on September 16, 2014, is confined in California State Prison-Sacramento (SAC), in the
custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of
Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #25, 501 I Street,
Sacramento, California 95814, on Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a
settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement
conference or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is
ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: Warden, SAC, P.O. Box 290002, Represa, California 95671:
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Newman at
the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the
court.
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate
and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 20, 2014
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?