Alonso v. Blackstone Financial Group, LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER on 15 Stipulation to Continue Trial signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/17/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSARIO ALONSO, CASE NO. CV F 11-1693 LJO DLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL (Doc. 15.) 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 BLACKSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. / 18 The parties stipulate to move the May 21, 2013 trial to September 17, 2013. 19 This Court carries the highest caseload of any district judge in the nation. This Court’s trial 20 calendar is heavily impacted. Only this action is set for trial on May 21, 2013, and the chances of the 21 trial proceeding are good. Multiple trials are set on September 17, 2013, and the chances of trial 22 proceeding on that date are poor. This action will receive no priority setting after giving up a firm date. 23 As such, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than December 21, 2013, to file papers to 24 inform this Court whether they still wish to continue trial to September 17, 2013. 25 Moreover, due to its heavy caseload, limited resources, and the need to prioritize criminal and 26 older civil matters over more recently filed actions, this Court ADMONISHES the parties that it is 27 unable to commit to address this action to meet the parties’ needs and expectations. As such, this Court 28 urges the parties to consider the conduct of all further proceedings by a U.S. Magistrate Judge, whose 1 1 caseload and availability is more accommodating to the parties. Forms to consent to a U.S. Magistrate 2 Judge are available on this Court’s website. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 66h44d December 17, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?